Sunday, February 17, 2013

Howard Brinton: Scientist and Mystic

I am pleased to report that my book on the Brintons is finally finished! I plan to send the final version to the publisher tomorrow and have a celebration at my home on Friday. I've already been asked to speak about the Brintons at Claremont Meeting in June, and give a week-long workshop on the Brintons at the national Quaker gathering (FGC) in July, and Chuck Fager is publishing a review and passages from my book in "Quaker Theology." I'm eagerly looking forward to launching this new book about two people I deeply admire who have influenced me (and Quakerism) in profound ways.

Over ten years in the making, it recounts the lives and achievements of "the most remarkable couple since George Fox [the founder of Quakerism] married Margaret Fell [the co-founder and 'mother' of Quakerism]." It has been a real joy to study and learn from this amazing couple and to see how they lived their faith so authentically. Here's how I describe them in my introduction:

"During their nearly fifty years of marriage, Howard and Anna Brinton exemplified what it meant to be a committed Quaker couple—teaching, writing, traveling and working for peace while raising a family of four children. For sixteen years, they were directors and teachers at Pendle Hill, a Quaker center for study and contemplation near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  There they wrote numerous articles, pamphlets, and books about the Quaker faith and practice that “reinvented” Quakerism for the twentieth century. Howard Brinton’s book Friends for 300 Years became a classic and was reissued in 2002 with commentary by the Quaker historian Margaret Bacon. Many of Howard’s pamphlets are still used to teach the basics of Quakerism in First Day and Quakerism 101 classes. With his solid grounding in science and philosophy, Howard created a theological framework for modern liberal Quakerism that has been challenged by scholars, but has never been replaced by anything of comparable stature or usefulness."

One of my favorite sections of the book deals with the Brintons' visit to England in 1932, where Howard gave the prestigious Swarthmore Lecture (its title was "Creative Worship") and spent a year teaching and lecturing at Woodbrooke (a Quaker adult study center) and at various Quaker meetings.  In his Autobiography, he talks about a remarkable mystical experience he had at Glastonbury (a place associated with Arthurian legends) and also at a major scientific conference where the theory of evolution was first publicly debated. This section juxtaposes the two central passions of Howard's life: mysticism and science. (Howard taught physics and math, but wrote his doctoral dissertation on the German mystic Jakob Boehme.) In this section we also learn a surprising fact: General Smuts (the South African who gave Gandhi such a hard time) was regarded as one of the major thinkers of his day for inventing the concept of Holism. Holism had a profound influence on Howard and on 20th century philosophy.

Mystic and Scientist 

Although Howard’s mystical experiences mainly took place in meetings for worship, he described in his Autobiography a personal experience of the mystical that occurred during his tour of England. Howard was fascinated by “rumors” that Jesus had visited Cornwall in one of the ships of the legendary Joseph of Arimathea. “The southwest part of England originally contained a Celtic type of Christianity quite different from the Roman Catholic type,” observed Howard, who felt an affinity for the mysticism underlying Celtic legends and myths.

Howard’s fascination with Celtic Christianity drew him to Glastonbury, a town in Somerset notable for the myths and legends surrounding Glastonbury Tor, the hill around which the town has grown. The Tor rises up like a pillar from the otherwise flat landscape of the Somerset “Levels,” or drained marshes, and was once an island.  Joseph of Arimathea supposedly sailed to this island with the Holy Grail, a sacred object often identified with the cup used by Jesus during the Last Supper. Glastonbury Abbey was believed to have been built at this site soon after Joseph’s landing, making it the oldest church in Christendom. The Tor has also been associated with the legendary Isle of Avalon and Camelot Castle, located ten miles away. In 1191, neatly labeled graves supposedly belonging to King Arthur and Queen Guinevere were discovered near the Abbey. Modern archaeology has revealed that fort originally stood at the top of the Tor, dating back to the 5th century.

While visiting Glastonbury, Howard stayed at the home of a prominent Friend, Roger Clark, former clerk of London Yearly Meeting. There he immersed himself in the history of this legendary town.

Howard’s walk to the top of Glastonbury Tor affected him deeply. Near the ruins of Glastonbury, Howard found the graves labeled as those of King Arthur and Guinevere. He walked past the famous Chalice Well, a spring of red water supposedly colored by the blood of Christ. Nearby was a famous thorn bush which blossoms only in winter. According to legend, Joseph of Arimathea stuck his staff into the ground and it began to flower at the same time that this bush flowers in the Holy Land. Going to the top of the Tor, Howard found the marble ruins of what appeared to have been a temple. This was St. Michael’s church, built on the site of an ancient fort and partially destroyed by an earthquake in 1275.

Gazing down at the plains of Glastonbury hundreds of feet below, Howard had a “feeling of awe” and sensed the presence of “spiritual beings going in a circle and singing.”

“This was definitely a mystical experience of the holy or numinous,” observed Howard. “I remained at the Tor top for some time enjoying it.”

He later decided that this was probably a “subjective” experience, but it affected him as if it were objective. “I have long believed that the subjective is much more important than the objective,” reflected Howard. Returning to Roger Clark’s house, Howard was reluctant to mention what had happened “for fear an account of it would spoil it.” Instead, Howard wandered around Gastonbury reciting to himself lines from Tennyson’s Idylls of the King. It was as if Howard had put his Quaker plainness aside and had drunk deep of the cup which Tennyson so hauntingly evokes:

  The cup, the cup itself, from which our Lord
  Drank at the last sad supper with his own.
  This, from the blessed land of Aromat--
  After the day of darkness, when the dead
  Went wandering o'er Moriah—the good saint
  Arimathaean Joseph, journeying brought
  To Glastonbury, where the winter thorn
  Blossoms at Christmas, mindful of our Lord.
  And there awhile it bode; and if a man
  Could touch or see it, he was healed at once,
  By faith, of all his ills.  But then the times
  Grew to such evil that the holy cup
  Was caught away to Heaven, and disappeared.
 
Drinking deep droughts of Celtic mysticism was “the greatest experience” Howard ever had in his life, according to his Autobiography. “I felt as if I had been lifted out the world around me into another world inhabited by Celtic legends… This Celtic experience cannot be described historically. It can only be felt mystically, as a present experience.”[1]
Soon after ascending to these mystical heights, Howard went to a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (known as the BA) at Westminster Hall. Founded in 1831 as a progressive counterpart to the Royal Society, which some considered conservative and elitist, the BA showcased leading scientific breakthroughs and issues. Among other memorable events, the BA sponsored the famous debate about evolution that took place between Julian Huxley and Bishop Samuel Wilberforce at Oxford in 1860. In 1932, the BA was celebrating its Centennial.
On his way to this event, Howard encountered an angry mob of laborers who were protesting to Parliament. The scene was very tense. Howard had to dodge stones that were being thrown by protesters. “Policemen mounted on horseback charged the mob,” recalled Howard. “At one time I felt the nose of a horse against my back.”[2] Howard had to walk through the mob in order to reach the hall.
Fortunately, the conference was well worth all the trouble it took to reach. Present were some of the leading scientists of the day. Howard was especially interested in hearing a lecture by the popular Quaker astrophysicist Arthur Eddington (1882-1940). Eddington was one of the first British physicists to understand and appreciate Einstein’s theory of relativity, which he was able to confirm by an experiment involving a solar eclipse. Eddington explained complex ideas in clear language that could be understood by lay people. He was also able to discuss the philosophical and religious implications of the new physics. Like Howard, he argued for a philosophical harmony between mysticism and science. Howard was anxious to see him since in 1929 Eddington had given the Swarthmore Lecture on a topic near to Howard’s heart—the relationship between science and a creedless religion. In his conclusion Eddington described Quakerism as most akin to scientific outlook because it is based on experience rather than a creed:
 
Religious creeds are a great obstacle to any full sympathy between the outlook of the scientist and the outlook which religion is supposed to require…. I won’t say that no kind of defence of creeds is possible. But I think it may be said that Quakerism holds out a hand to the scientist…. The spirit which animates us refuses to regard any kind of creed as its goal.[3]
 
Eddington’s lecture on the evolution of the universe at BA proved to be a hit. “When Arthur Eddington spoke,” recalled Howard, “Everyone pulled out their notebooks.”[4]

The president of the BA was General Jan Christiaan Smuts (1870-1950),  the world-renowned South African and British Commonwealth statesman, military leader and philosopher. Nowadays Smuts is mainly remembered as the man that Gandhi had to contend with when fighting discriminatory race laws in South Africa, but in his day Smuts was known for his brilliance in many fields. He began his career as a general in the Boer War, served as a British field marshal during World War I,  and then became prime minister of South Africa. He had the foresight to advocate for small reparations and reconciliation with Germany and for a strong League of Nations—ideas which unfortunately did not gain acceptance. His most important intellectual work was Holism and Evolution (1926), which was one of Howard’s favorite scientific books. In it Smuts pioneered the concept of holism, defined as "the tendency in nature to form wholes that are greater than the sum of the parts through creative evolution.” Smuts applied this concept not only to biology but also to political development, such as the “unification of the four provinces in the Union of South Africa, the idea of the British Commonwealth of Nations, and, finally, the great whole resulting from the combination of the peoples of the earth in a great league of nations.”[5] Einstein admired Smuts’ intellect and said Smuts was one of only eleven people who truly understood the theory of relativity. Einstein also believed that relativity and holism would be seen as the defining ideas of the twentieth century.

In his Autobiography Howard doesn’t mention that Smuts coined the term aparteid and supported this policy of racial separateness throughout his life. Smuts was certainly a complex figure not easily pigeon-holed. He opposed Gandhi’s political views, but respected him as a man. Despite profound differences, Smuts and Gandhi became friends. When Gandhi left South Africa in 1914, Smuts wrote: "The saint has left our shores. I sincerely hope forever.”

What impressed Howard was Smuts’ comprehensive knowledge of science and his espousal of a holistic view of the universe. “I heard General Smuts take part in discussions on four… occasions, and each time he cast the weight of his clear and compelling mind on the side of the organic as contrasted with the mechanistic conception of nature.”[6] Howard saw the conference as a struggle between contending philosophies of science 

In the zoology and geology sections I heard the two schools of thought oppose each other on the problem of evolution. Here also such leaders as Sir Arthur Keith, Prof. H. Fairfield Osborne, and the young Julian Huxley discussed our human ancestry. In the psychology department I saw Behaviorism routed by Dr. O. S. Myers, Sir Oliver Lodge and General Smuts. In the Physics section I listened to such pathfinders of thought as J.J. Thomson and Niels Bohr.[7] 

The final address of the conference was given by Smuts, who was not only a scientist, but a major political figure. When he gave his final presidential address, members of the royal family were there to hear what he had to say.[8] Smuts’ address, entitled "The Scientific Worldview of Today,” attempted to overcome the Cartesian split between the world of matter and the world of mind using principles from quantum physics and evolution. According to Howard, Smuts made “a vigorous appeal to his hearers to interpret the universe in terms of the higher categories of life and mind rather than in terms of the lower categories of matter.”[9] This holistic approach played an important part in Howard’s efforts to reinvent Quakerism in light of modern physics.



[1] Autobiography, p. 55.
[2] Autobiography, p. 56.
[3] Science and the Unseen World, MacMillan Co, 1930, p. 88-89.
[4] Autobiography, p. 56.
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Smuts
[6] Friends Intelligencer, Twelfth Month 5, 1931. 1015.
[7] Friends Intelligencer, Twelfth Month 5, 1931. 1015.
[8] Autobiography, p. 56.
[9] Friends Intelligencer, Twelfth Month 5, 1931. 1015.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Guns and the Gospel

The Pasadena Palm Sunday Peace Parade is organizing a gun buyback back campaign and is reaching out to the religious community to encourage them to contribute to a gun buyback fund that will “turn swords into plowshares.” (See http://laquaker.blogspot.com/2013/02/turning-swords-in-plowshares-statement.html  and http://thepeaceacademy.org/peaceparade

To us, it seems pretty obvious that Jesus, aka “the Prince of Peace,” wouldn’t be a big supporter of the Second Amendment nor would he favor the arms trade, drones, and other forms of violence. Yet not all Christians see guns as a problem, or as un-Christian. A recent Arkansas law (the so-called “Church Protection Act”) allows people to pack concealed pistols in churches. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/04/arkansas-guns-in-church-bill-passes-in-house_n_2618689.html ) Some preachers are such ardent pro-gun advocates they preach this message from the pulpit. A gun-loving pastor in even asked his congregation to bring guns to church to celebrate July 4th. (http://www.askmen.com/money/money-news/28_gun-loving-pastor-piece-be-with-you.html.) Christians have borne arms, served in the military, and on the police force. So what does the Gospel tell us about the right to bear arms?

Just prior to his entry into Jerusalem, a city Jesus knew would be hostile to his prophetic message, he surprises his disciples by telling them they must arm themselves, in apparent contradiction to what he said in the sermon on the mount: “Love your enemies.”

35 [Jesus] asked them [the eleven apostles], "When I sent you out without a purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?"
They said, "No, not a thing."
36 He said to them, "But now the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37 For I tell you, this scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered among the lawless’; and indeed what is written about me is being fulfilled."
38 They [the disciples] said, "See, Lord, here are two swords."
"It is enough," he replied. (Luke 22:35-38, NRSV).

In this passage, Jesus tells his disciples to take up swords not to defend themselves (two swords would hardly have sufficed against the Roman legions), but to fulfill a scriptural prophesy. The Messiah would be counted among the lawless, and what do the lawless do? They carry swords.

Later the moment of testing comes in the garden of Gethsemane. In the dead of night Jesus is confronted with armed opponents, and Peter does what comes naturally: he uses his sword in self-defense, cutting off the ear of his assailant. Instead of praising Peter, Jesus reaches down and heals the wounded man. Then he utters his most famous condemnation of violence: “Those that live by the sword perish by the sword” (Matt. 26:52).

This message transformed the hearts and minds of Jesus’ followers. In the darkness of night Peter “stood his ground” and did what seemed perfectly natural, legal and even commendable: he defended his leader using a lethal weapon. But Jesus demonstrated a better way: non-violent resistance and healing. Jesus was willing to sacrifice his life rather than harm another.

Most of Jesus’ disciples followed this example, and all of the apostles were persecuted and killed. None resisted violently. They set an example of nonviolence that has been followed by peace-loving Christians ever since, from St Martin (the Roman soldier who converted to Christianity and refused to bear arms) to Martin Luther King.

 When Dr. King said “America was the greatest purveyor of violence in the world,” he was talking about the arms trade.  Today the United States sells over 70% of the armaments in the world and spends more on war than nearly all the rest of the world put together. Some of the arms we sell end up in the hands of our enemies, just as some legally purchased guns eventually end up in the hands of criminals. Many of the unpopular regimes we support with our weapons have populations that hate us for this reason. Most people resent the drones that fly over their homes and terrorize them, and some turn to terrorism in response. The international arms trade enriches the elites but doesn’t make average Americans any safer. Americans own more weapons than citizens in any other wealthy nations, yet we are the least safe.

Perhaps it is time to take seriously, and update, Jesus’ message. “Those who make a living from firearms will perish from firearms.” This is literally true. 30,000 Americans die each year due to firearms, twenty times more than in other rich countries. Our addiction to guns is literally killing us. It is time for us to follow the example and words of Jesus, and heal those who are deaf and blind to these realities.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Turning Swords in Plowshares: Statement on Gun Violence by the Pasadena Palm Sunday Peace Parade Committee

This statement in response to a Pasadena Star News article was approved by the Pasadena Palm Sunday Peace Parade Committee. See http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_22528605/pasadena-officials-explore-gun-buyback-program-help-curb.
 
We welcome your response and would like to know about similar efforts in other parts of the country.
 
Turning Swords into Plowshares:
A Statement About Gun Violence
by the Pasadena Palm Sunday Peace Parade Committee

We are grateful for Brenda Gazzar's recent article (2-5-13) in the Pasadena Star News about gun violence and gun buyback programs. Gun buybacks can be a powerful symbol that captures public attention. We are grateful for the swift interest of the city and police and other groups showing such passion to make this happen in soon in Pasadena. At the Public Safety committee on Monday Councilman Steve Madison said, “We don’t want to miss this opportunity. We can’t wait until June to make this happen”…. In the eagerness to make this happen, it’s important that we know how it came about and who is indeed making it happen.
The initiative for the proposed gun buyback program came from the religious community, specifically, the Palm Sunday Peace Parade, which has been organizing events for the past ten years celebrating Jesus as the Prince of Peace. The theme of this year’s parade is “turning swords into ploughshares” (Isaiah 2:4), and one of the actions we have proposed is a gun buyback. We envision melting guns into something useful or beautiful like a public art sculpture, which would capture the essence of this verse.
It’s important to note that those of us planning the Peace Parade oppose all forms of violence—including gun violence, the international weapons trade, drones, torture, and war itself. We believe that it is possible, with God’s help, to create a peaceful community and a peaceful world. We are convinced that love is more powerful than any weapon.
As an editorial in the Pasadena Star News noted, the LA gun buyback was a "success" because it drew a lot of attention to this issue but it probably did not do much to reduce the number of guns or of gun violence. What is needed are policy changes, and a change in attitude.
As members of the Palm Sunday Peace Parade committee, we agree that a gun buyback program isn’t enough, but it’s an important and significant step in the right direction.
A gun buyback program sends a powerful message: our community opposes gun violence. When a police officer in Pasadena was asked if he'd be willing to donate $200 to a gun buyback program, he didn’t hesitate to say, "Yes." When someone is willing to pay to get guns off the street, you know they're serious about reducing gun violence. That's a message the churches and our city have the opportunity to convey.
We feel that the religious community has a special role to play in gun violence reduction. Each year, for the past ten years, over 150 of us have taken part in a Palm Sunday Peace Parade to honor Jesus as the Prince of Peace. The Bible makes it clear that Jesus came to Jerusalem in fulfillment of Zachariah’s prophesy that the Messiah would come to end war (Zech 9:9-10).
The Peace Parade will began at the Messiah Lutheran Church on March 24 at 3:00 pm and end at the Paseo on Colorado Boulevard. All are welcome to join us in this event, and to take part in our gun buyback program.
One of the goals of this program is to make guns seem less "cool." Like Dr Eric Walsh, head of Public Health in Pasadena, we see violence as a disease or an addiction in need of comprehensive treatment. Currently young men are buying assault rifles and other weapons to prove their manliness, just as they used to buy cigarettes. We need to show that it isn't cool or manly to own a gun. Changing attitudes about cigarettes has saved countless lives. We need a similar approach to ending our addiction to violence.
To make a significant difference, a gun buyback program in Pasadena needs to be linked to education and policy changes and it needs broad support of the faith community. In one of our initial meetings at the Flintridge Foundation 2-4-13, 18 community leaders took part, including a number of religious leaders: Pastor Kerwin Manning, president of the CCC—the Clergy Community Coalition, Rev. John Bledsoe, President of the IMA—the Interdenominational Alliance, Pastor Joe Roos, Pastor of the Pasadena Mennonite Church along with a number of his parishioners, and three members of the local Quaker Meeting. The consensus was that the religious community be given an opportunity to make a commitment to support a gun buyback program and gun safety training (with more accessibility to trigger locks).
The Palm Sunday Peace Parade Committee also recommends that people of faith work on some of these other proven methods to reduce violence:
Øan assault weapon ban,
Ømore funding for psychological counseling (especially for at-risk teens),
Øgang prevention (including job training),
Ønonviolence training in schools and elsewhere,
Øaddressing root issues that cause violence: the need for jobs and affordable housing in mixed income neighborhoods
Ø disallowing sales of guns at gun shows or through private sales without a background check. (40% of guns are sold this way.)
Øsupporting numerous programs in the city, such as 2020, that aim at reducing violence.
If cities across the country instituted voluntary gun buy back programs, it could spur the Federal government to initiate a national gun buy back program like the one in Australia. Australia’s gun back program and gun reform laws have been a huge success: since 1996, gun-related deaths have dropped by half, and there haven’t been any mass shootings in Australia. (http://abcnews.go.com/International/australia-model-successful-gun-control-laws/story?id=18007055)
Each year, over 30,000 people in the US die due to gun-related deaths. In Japan, fewer than 50 people a year die from gun-related deaths; in Germany, Italy and France, fewer than 150; and in Canada, fewer than 200. We in America can do better. Like Martin Luther King, who believed a better world is possible, we must believe that it is possible to end gun violence and the massacre of children in America. With God's help, we can make a difference.
 

 

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Jill Shook and Bert Newton speak about their books, affordable housing and Jesus' "subversive wisdom" at Vroman's

Over seventy people showed up for a book signing at Vroman's Bookstore by Jill Shook (my wife and author of "Making Housing Happen: Faith-based Affordable Housing Models") and Bert Newton (author of "Subversive Wisdom: sociopolitical dimensions of the Gospel of John"). There were so many people that a number of them had to stand!

Vroman's is the oldest and most prestigious bookstore in Pasadena, and is known nation-wide. Best-selling authors and notables like Jimmy Carter and most recently, Sonia Sotomajor have given book signings at Vroman's. So my wife was in very good company!

Bert and Jill have worked together for many years--organizing the yearly Palm Sunday Peace Parade (where Jill and I met), going to City Council meetings to speak out about affordable housing and other issues affecting the marginalized and low-income folk, etc. They also collaborated on a chapter in Jill's book entitled "Ownership, Land and Jubilee Justice," which provides a biblical rationale for land redistribution, debt forgiveness, and economic justice for the poor, landless and homeless. Jill and Bert each took turns speaking for about 5 minutes each, interweaving theology and practical solutions to the current housing crisis.

People loved what Bert and Jill shared, and purchased 21 copies of her book! She signed many of her books: "Let's make housing happen!"

Pat O'Reilly, executive director of ECPAC (Ecumenical Council of Pasadena), invited Jill to give a 15-minute inspirational talk at ECPAC's annual dinner in which religious leaders from throughout Pasadena take part. This is a golden opportunity for Jill to share her message of hope based on a gospel vision of housing justice for all....

If you missed this book signing, not to worry. There will be another one here in Pasadena on Saturday, Feb 9, at 4 PM at the Archive Bookstore, 396 E Washington Blvd, Pasadena CA 91104. This is the largest religious bookstore in the area, with over 75,000 used and new theological books, so it is well worth a visit. See http://www.archivescalifornia.com/


Excerpt from Jill's book talk

I’ve had the joy of helping several people save their homes from foreclosure here in Pasadena. I totally admire the work of Rose Gudiel, whom I feature briefly in my book. She saved her home and has helped many others to save theirs. In many ways she exemplifies subversive wisdom. Like those I have helped and thousands of others, she attempted over and over to get a home loan modification to no avail, even though she qualified. Despite hundreds of calls, completed forms turned in on time, the banks would consistently lose the paperwork, say they would incomplete, and start the process over again…

To finally get the attention of Indymac, which is now One West here on Colorado and Lake, clergy and other brave folks stood in the bank and refused to go, like Jesus the rule-breaker and liberator. Like Jesus who overturned the money tables in the temple, they did a public action that finally got the attention of the bank. They stayed until they finally had dialogue with the bank about modifying her loan.

The churches of Hawaii also saw the need for this face-to-face dialogue. In fact, the churches got together and passed a law called Face-to-Face. Simply by requiring that bank personnel sit down with someone facing a foreclosure and have a face-to-face conversation, they cut their foreclosure rate in half!

One-on-one conversation can be “subversive” …that is how the churches initially in Brooklyn, then in South Bronx in NY began organizing their community, with one-on-one conversations. After hundreds of people shared their concerns and stories with each other, people realized they had internalized what the movies and outsiders were saying about the horrors of South Bronx and Brooklyn.

By listening to each other they began to view the burned out properties in their community as an asset and each other as an asset. They gained enough relational power though thousands of one-on-one conversations to have the audacity go to the city and ask for the land. The city believed in them and gave them the land!

To date, the churches of Brooklyn and South Bronx have built 5,000 units of for-sale affordable housing using the Nehemiah Housing Strategy. By infusing the pride of home ownership back into their communities, they began to break the downward cycle of poverty, and the crime rate plummeted. Nehemiah in the Bible was a master organizer and community developer.

Chapter in my book that tells about this, focuses on the churches of South Bronx which built 1000 of these 5000 homes. When my husband Anthony was reviewing this chapter for this Revised Version Making Housing Happen, he felt it was too fairy tale; too good to be true. So we found articles in the NY Time and from NPR, telling how the Nehemiah homes have been “a bulwark of stability in neighborhoods devastated by arson and neglect… especially during the mortgage crisis.” To date not one low-income family in South Bronx has defaulted on their loan—not one foreclosure among the 1,000 Nehemiah homes built by the churches of South Bronx. Now that is good news to the poor!

To double check I called the office president of the borough of South Bronx to see what he thought of the Nehemiah Homes built by the churches. Wilhelm Ronda explained that the investment of the churches, at a time when no one would touch this community, has turned the community around. South Bronx now attracts businesses that invest in this community. Sarah Plowden, one of the home owner said, “We more than just bought homes, we bought into each other as a people.”

Other chapters in my book have focused on a similar kind of subversive wisdom—a living out of the kingdom of God here and now. You can go to the corner of Union and 8th in downtown LA and can see for yourself a beautiful building, once so gang infested and dilapidated that floors were falling into each other. Through a small Bible Study the residents began to dream and feel empowered, eventually bringing lawsuits against the negligent landlord. The landlord eventually gave up the building and these low-income immigrant residents became the owners. They partnered with the city of LA and Low income Housing tax credits. Today this building, that was once an eyesore, stands as a beautiful monument of God’s love and grace, full of hope and dreams. Rather than turning to gangs, the youth now graduate from college and dream of bright futures.

Organized people that creates power for justice is the power of non-violence, a demonstration of God’s love and power to create beauty and hope. 
 
[Jill concluded with practical ways to help in this work.]
 
Right now we are helping a family in Monrovia to save their home. There’s a Greater Pasadena Affordable Housing Group that you can join. We are working on local policies. Additionally, I’m involved with family Promise, where homeless families are housed in churches, synagogues or mosques for a week then move within a rotation of 14 congregations. During the day they are at a resource center with a full time director who helps them to find jobs and housing. 176 of these networks exist nationwide. We are blessed to have one in San Gabriel Valley. But we need you help.

Bert is again planning the Palm Sunday Peace Parade, celebrating the Prince of Peace… If you are interested in exploring any of these ways to get involved and to help make housing happen, please contact me at
 
 
To order her book, go to
 
To read her article in Sojourners magazine, go to

http://sojo.net/magazine/2011/12/seven-ways-home


Thursday, January 24, 2013

A Prophetic Word from a sixteen-year-old on Martin Luther King day

The confluence of three historic events--the Emancipation Proclamation (1863), Martin Luther King's "I have a dream speech" (1963) and the second inauguration of our first African-American president (2003)--was a watershed moment that should have brought out the best in any speaker worth his or her salt.
 
But the speeches I heard at public events during the course of two days left me feeling disappointed, frustrated, and bored. Almost without exception, religious and political leaders here in Pasadena spoke in platitudes and feel-good generalities, talking about the need to put aside our differences, come together in unity, etc. etc. Many distorted Martin Luther King's vision of social justice into the individualistic American Dream ("work hard and you'll succeed"). None raised any controversial issues, like the need to address systemic poverty, economic disparity, our bloated military budget, and endless wars, that got Dr. King into trouble and made him a genuine prophet.
 
There were two exceptions. At the Jackie Robinson Center (named after the famous athlete who brought the color barrier and became the first black player in the major leagues), an award is given out to elementary and high school students who created art or wrote essays honoring Dr. Martin Luther King.
 
The two first-place winners of the essay content were both white girls, tall and willowy, but other winners were Asian, black and Latino. I would love to have heard what they had to say.
 
What the junior high winner said was that we need to take seriously the problem of homelessness, and added that there are over a million homeless kids attending school. This number was mind-boggling. How can it be that a million kids are homeless in a country as rich as ours? I commend this girl for raising such a disturbing question--the kind of provocative question that Dr. King would have asked.
 
Madeline Cameron, a 16-year-old high school student from the Pasadena Peace and Justice Academy, was also a winner in every sense. She spoke about Martin Luther King's commitment to peace, his courage in speaking out against the Vietnam war, and how we have been embroiled in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have cost countless lives and taken money away from needed social programs. She also brought up the infamous wall separating the United States and Mexico, and how US economic policies have left Mexican farmers destitute and forced many to come here to earn a liveliness. She spoke with great feeling of the hundreds who have died trying to cross the border to find work in the United States.
 
She spoke from the heart, and with real knowledge, about issues that Dr King would cared deeply about.
 
"She truly understands Dr. King," I thought, my eyes brimming with tears.
 
I was grateful that some members of the rising generation understand, and sad that most of our leaders don't want to understand, what Dr. King stood for.
 
I said this to one of the teachers at the Peace and Justice Academy,  he replied, "Yeah, so many people try to neuter Martin Luther King."
 
I want to commend not only the girls who spoke truth so eloquently, but also those who selected them as winners of the MLK essay contest. These educators gave young people a platform on which to voice their deeply felt concerns--concerns that all Americans should take seriously.
 
Here is Madeline Cameron's essay, used with her permission.



Martin Luther King Day Essay
 
by Madeline Cameron, 16 years old
Pasadena Peace and Justice Academy

August 28, 1963, over 200,000 people witnessed one of the most powerful speeches in American history. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. expressed his hope for a broken nation, one that was tainted with segregation, violence, and compromised morals. I believe he is one of the greatest role models in history, not only striving to stop violence, but stressing the importance of stopping it in a peaceful manner:

“We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence.”

Our nation has come a long way since Dr. King gave his speech. But we are still a broken society. True, our country has made great leaps and bounds in its mission to expel racism and prejudice. No longer do we have drinking fountains that proclaim, “whites only”. But there is still violence in the streets of our cities. There is still corruption in our governments. And there is still persecution in our communities. My dream for America is that we as a nation take the first steps toward world peace, setting an example for other countries in the midst of a world flaming with the heat of violence.

We have far to go. For 11 years, the United States has been a major player in the war in Afghanistan. We have spent over $468 billion since it started, money that could have been used to support our homeless, our schools, our hospitals, and our environment. But money is not the only thing the war has cost us. Since 2001, over 2000 Americans have lost their lives in the Afghanistan war. Many more have been permanently injured. And it is estimated that 10, 878 Afghan women, men, and children have died in the war.

In “Why I am Opposed to the War in Vietnam”, Dr. King showed that war was the enemy and manipulator of the poor and marginalized, taking advantage of their vulnerable state and sending them to fight for the country that betrayed them.

“I speak out against this war, not in anger, but with anxiety and sorrow in my heart, and, above all, with a passionate desire to see our beloved country stand as the moral example of the world. I speak out against this war because I am disappointed with America.”

As a world superpower, America must set the example. After centuries of experience, I am horrified that America has not acknowledged the futility of war. War is not a way of solving problems; instead, it exacerbates them. I do not believe our world will ever be completely without violence.

But there will never be hope if we do not strive towards peace. However, striving for peace does not simply demand giving up physical violence. Recently, five students from my school visited the wall between the U.S. border and Mexico. Mexico was just a few hundred feet away, but because of the conflict between the U.S. and Mexico, the border was almost inaccessible, and highly dangerous. Many Americans resent immigrants, thinking that they take jobs desperately needed in this economy. In reality, Americans refuse the menial jobs that immigrants take; and furthermore, we are the main reason that immigrants are forced to come seeking work. The U.S. government donates millions of dollars every year to subsidize grain production, producing an artificially low price of grain with which Mexican farmers cannot compete. Forced off their land, they come to America desperate for work, but instead, they are deported, taken from their families, or thrown in jail. The U.S. is creating a problem, but unwilling to admit that they are responsible for the economic destruction in another country. Is this not violence too?

 I may not live to see the world achieve peace, or offer a solution to the unfair treatment of undocumented immigrants, or ensure economic justice for all who wish to work an honest day’s labor. Yet over time we have seen the end of racial segregation, and the beginning of gender equality. My hope is that my generation will open its eyes to the injustice in the world, even if it’s painful to see. “We cannot walk alone,” Dr. King said, “…we shall always march ahead.”

Although it may seem an insurmountable task, there are many others that share our dream. They too find inspiration in Dr. King, believing that we can make a change. It is rarely easy to stand up for what is right, but the consequence will be far worse if we stay silent. I want my generation
to say, “We created a better world. We stood up for what was right, and the world listened. We made the first move, and the world followed in our footsteps.”

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Yuki Brinton and the Autobiography of Howard Brinton


Today, as I do my final revision of my biography of Howard and Anna Brinton, I feel a deep sense of gratitude to Yuki Takahashi Brinton for transcribing Howard's autobiography during the final year of his life. Without her help, and cooperation, I would not have been able to write my biography of the Brintons, as I explain in this epilogue.


Origins of  the Autobiography of Howard Brinton

For over thirty years, the Autobiography of Howard Brinton, one of the foremost exponents of 20th century Quakerism, lay in a cardboard box, unread and virtually unknown. I learned of it when I gave a series of talks to promote a book I had written about Western unprogrammed Quakers. During my presentations I invariably discussed Howard and Anna Brinton because they startedFriends Bulletin (the Western Quaker magazine that I used to edit) and played an essential role in the founding of Pacific Yearly Meeting, whose history I chronicled in A Western Quaker Reader. I bemoaned the fact that little had been written about the Brintons, who were key figures in the development of American Quakerism both in the Eastern as well as in the Western USA. I concluded that someone should write a book-length study of these important figures, as was the case with other leading Quakers of this period, such as Henry Cadbury, Rufus Jones, Clarence Pickett, Thomas Kelly, and Douglas Steere.

After I gave this talk in Philadelphia, a lively, white-haired woman stepped forward and introduced herself as Catharine Cary, the daughter of Anna and Howard Brinton. She asked if I knew about an Autobiography that her father had dictated to Yuki Brinton just prior to his death. I confessed that I had not heard of it, but was very interested in seeing such a document. I also wondered if any historian was working on this project. I was surprised to discover that this unpublished memoir had been languishing in the Haverford College Quaker collection for 30 years and no one had written anything about it.

I was given a photocopy of this work, which turned out to be over 130 pages long and was full of personal information not found anywhere else. Unlike his teacher Rufus Jones, Howard was reticent about his personal life and revealed little about it in print. His one attempt at personal history, a talk for the Historical Society entitled“Friends for 75 Years,” provided more theological than autobiographical data.

One reason that this Autobiography may have been dormant for so many years is that it was the “offspring” of an unusual marriage, which I describe in my biography of the Brintons. In May 1972, three years after the death of his first wife Anna, with whom he had been married for over fifty years and produced four children, Howard married Yuki Takahashi, a Japanese teacher, translator, and student of Quakerism. Howard was 88 years old, nearly blind, and in failing health. Yuki was 60 years old, though she looked much younger. Howard decided to re-marry because he was in failing health and needed a caretaker, but his relationship with Yuki was much deeper than that and was based on a friendship going back two decades. The marriage lasted less than a year, but it produced a remarkable memoir that Howard dictated to Yuki during his final days. This collaborative effort, written under the shadow of mortality and lovingly if not always accurately transcribed, enhances our understanding not only of Howard’s life but also of 20th century Quakerism.

While it is uncertain whether Howard intended for his memoir to be published, he did devote his usual care to writing it and probably had some thought of its being published or at least read by future historians. After Howard’s death, Yuki sent Anna Brinton Wilson (“Cousin Nan”) a copy of the Autobiography. She sent back comments and wrote, “I shall want to buy a copy of the book as soon as it is out.”[1] It is clear that at least one member of the Brinton family felt that the manuscript was publishable. Most felt it needed editing and fact-checking, and did not want it to be published.

Because of her Japanese upbringing, Yuki was also reluctant to share this work, or any details about her life. It took considerable coaxing for me to find out as much as I did about her life and her relationship to Howard. In a letter date August 22, 2004, she wrote: “I enjoyed talking with you. I enjoyed because you listened! That’s why I talked too much. That is dangerous.”

Where Yuki saw danger, I saw opportunity. Besides, I very much enjoyed listening to this remarkable woman tell her story. She had a lot of wisdom to share, as well as great humility—qualities that are usually connected. Here are some facts I was able to glean about her remarkable life.

Born on Dec. 20, 1912, Yuki Takahashi was one of five children born in Dairen, Manchuria, to Motokichi Takahashi (1873-1920) and Naoko Takahashi (1881-1971). Yuki’s father was a high-ranking Japanese government official who had majored in political science at Princeton University. There he met Woodrow Wilson, whom he greatly admired, and became a Presbyterian. Yuki’s father was sent as a Japanese envoy to the United States after WWI, where he died of a heart attack in Seattle, Washington, at age 47.

Yuki’s family had moved from Manchuria to Tokyo, Japan, in 1914. There Yuki was educated at a private school run by Sophia Anabelle Irwin and Robert Irwin. She was trained as a kindergarten teacher. In the 1930s she worked as a kindergarten teacher in Dairen, Manchuria.

Yuki’s sister Taneko went to Pendle Hill in 1939 and stayed until war broke out between Japan and the United States in 1942. At that time, her sister returned to Japan. Hearing her sister’s glowing reports about Pendle Hill sparked Yuki’s interest in Quakerism. She eventually went to work at the Quaker Center in Tokyo around 1950.

A prominent Quaker named Passmore Elkinton introduced Howard to Yuki, who became his interpreter and assistant. Impressed by her passion for Quakerism, he encouraged Yuki to come to Pendle Hill, even though she felt her English was not good enough.

There she translated Friends for Three Hundred Years into Japanese, a daunting task she was able to accomplish with the help of Howard and Elizabeth Vining.
In transcribing Howard's autobiography, Yuki was painfully conscious that she lacked the editorial skill that Anna possessed, but did her best. Howard also did his best to recall what happened in his life, but with his failing health and eyesight, he had to rely on his memory and could not verify dates and other details. How much of what Yuki wrote were Howard’s exact words, and how accurate some of Howard’s memories were, we will never know for certain. I have done my best to verify names and dates, and was surprised to find that most of the names and dates that Howard remembered could be verified. I became convinced that, despites its many deficiencies, Howard’s Autobiography is an invaluable resource and an excellent starting point for a biographer.

Many of the errors are trivial. Because of her difficulties in pronouncing English, Yuki sometimes mixed up“L’s” and “R’s” (as in the sentence, “we attended a concert in London where the English loyalty showed up”). Some of the errors involved recalling events out of order, like recounting his trip to Scotland after his first trip to Britain Yearly Meeting rather than after his second.

Howard was also unable to polish the style and to make his narrative flow as he would if he had been able to read and edit what he had written. According to Yuki, Howard’s daughter Lydia helped in editing the Autobiography and it would not have been readable without her assistance.

“I am undertaking this with much hesitation and some embarrassment,” Howard wrote. “My principal handicap is that I cannot read or write (because of my poor eye sight) so I am dictating these memoirs to my secretary and general helper Yuki Takahashi….In dictating this I cannot go back and make revisions. I must always go forward recklessly, not always knowing just where sentences or paragraphs may end.”

Because Howard had a disciplined mind, he was able to write coherently in spite of these handicaps. His lifelong exposure to Quaker autobiography and journals no doubt helped prepare him for this work. He liked to reminisce about his past and had also been thinking of writing a memoir since he was in his forties.[2]

Although the memoirs contain inaccuracies, as one would expect from such a “raw” work, they also have the freshness of a tape-recorded oral history. In some cases, Howard reveals feelings and opinions that he would have expressed guardedly or not at all in a work less “reckless.” For instance, when he describes going to Friends World Committee Conference in Oxford in 1952, soon after the publication of Friends for 300 Years, Howard says, “I sent a copy… to every American delegate. Many of the American delegates were from Pastoral meetings. I wanted to be sure that they knew what real Quakerism was.”[3]This unusually frank comment reveals quite clearly that Friends for 300 Years was not written as objective history, but to promote an unprogrammed Friends’ perspective of Quakerism. He also talks about mystical experiences that he had at Glastonbury and frankly discloses his personal feelings while working on numerous Quaker projects.

The memoir that Howard and Yuki had worked on for a year extended as far as Howard’s trip to Japan in 1952. This being time when he and Yuki met, it is a fitting conclusion to their collaborative effort. As Howard tells us as well as his grateful amanuensis and spouse, “the most important event [that happened to me] in Tokyo was to secure Yuki Takahashi as my secretary and guide and interpreter.”

After Howard’s death, Henry Cadbury asked Yuki if she’d like to stay on at Pendle Hill to assist in the library. She accepted the offer and stayed until 1993 when she moved, somewhat reluctantly, to Kendal, a Quaker retirement center near Pendle Hill. There she died on July 3, 2006, after a brief illness. Her memorial minutes noted :

At Pendle Hill she helped and befriended many foreign students and was a gracious presence representing Japanese culture. She also served faithfully for many years on the Pendle Hill publications committee.

Yuki had a keen eye for small things: for English expressions like “Thank you very much” and all cats for they spoke Japanese, and modest gifts like oranges or cookies, or an introduction to her friend who might become your friend, too. Sometimes the gift was a sharp question but often an invitation to tea or Scrabble. With children she became a child, and with adults a keen watcher as her hearing grew less serviceable.

One of her gifts was her devotion to Howard Brinton. Had it not been for Yuki, we would have no way of knowing the personal side of Howard’s life. For this reason, I feel a profound debt to Yuki for encouraging Howard to persevere with his memoirs. Without her labor of love, I probably would not have undertaken this biography, my own labor of love.


[1] See “from Anna Brinton Wilson’s letter 1973 or ’74,” Box 1189.
[2] See letter to Mary James, Mills College, June 18th 1930. “As I sit here looking out my study window on San Francisco Bay I am attempting to conjure up on the dim background of the hills beyond it the faint images of the time when I first set my feet on the long road to learning. They came with great difficulty at first and then faster and fast like ghosts pouring out of a deserted building…” He wrote about the importance of West Chester Friends School and the “Boys Sporting League” and other childhood memories, including poems that later appear in his Autobiography.
[3] Autobiography, p. 96.