The
paradigm of “just peacemaking” is one of the most important recent developments
in interfaith and ecumenical social activism, though it is not as widely known
as it should be. This eminently practical as well as deeply theological
approach is helping people of different faith perspectives to find common
ground and work together for peace. As someone who has been involved with
interfaith peacemaking for over a decade, I find this approach extremely
exciting and hopeful.
The
idea of “just peacemaking” originated with Glen Stassen, a professor of Christian
ethics at Fuller Seminary and an Evangelical Christian who was a student of Reinhold
Niebuhr (Obama’s favorite theologian). Niebuhr, one of America’s most
influential theologians in the 1950s, gave up on pacifism during WWII and
became a “Christian realist,” justifying war in situations where Christians
must confront what he saw as inherently evil systems like Nazism and Communism.
Stassen has been influenced by both Niebuhr and by John Yoder, the Mennonite pacifist theologian. Stassen describes himself both as a "pacifist" and "realist" who is ardently anti-war—he earned a degree in nuclear
physics as well as Christian ethics and devoted himself to nuclear weapons
reduction and elimination from the 1980s on. He has also worked with the AFSC
as well as with Evangelicals for Social Action to oppose war. On the door of
his office at Fuller is the FNCL sign: “War is not the answer.”
Stassen
argues that pacifists and just war theorists/Christian realists will never
agree because they come from very different theological perspectives What all Christians
can agree on, says Stassen, is that God calls us to do our utmost to avoid war
and promote peace. After considerable study, Stassen has come up with ten
"best peacemaking practices" that have been proven to work:
1.
Support nonviolent direct action
2.
Take independent initiatives to reduce threats
3.
Use cooperative conflict resolution
4.
Acknowledge responsibility for conflict and injustice and seek
repentance and forgiveness
5.
Advance democracy, human rights and interdependence
6.
Foster just and sustainable economic development
7.
Work with emerging cooperative forces in the international
system
8.
Strengthen
the UN and international efforts for cooperation and human rights
9.
Reduce
offensive weapons and the weapons trad
10.
Encourage
grassroots peacemaking groups and voluntary associations
Stassen shows these
techniques not only work in the real world, they are also consistent with biblical
teachings. He published his ground-breaking book Just Peacemaking:
Transforming Initiatives for Justice and Peace (1992) when the Cold War ended in the early
1990s. At that time he was deeply impressed with non-violent resistance efforts
he had encountered in Eastern Europe. In the aftermath of 9/11, when just war
theorists and Christian realists were justifying the “war against terror,” and
the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, Stassen questioned this response and put
together an anthology by Christians of various denominations called Just Peacemaking:
The New Paradigm for the Ethics of Peace and War (2008).
As a
follow up to this book, Susan Thistlethwaite, a United Methodist pastor as well
professor and former president of Chicago Theological Seminary, published Interfaith Just Peacemaking: Jewish,
Christian and Muslim Perspectives on the New Paradigm of Peace and War. This
fascinating book contains chapters by leading Jewish, Muslim and Christian scholars
that explore the practical application as well as theological basis for Just
Peacemaking from Abrahamic faith perspectives. These scholars don't all agree
on every point--God forbid!--but they are in general agreement that the practices
of Just Peacemaking are consistent with the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran.
This is
good news indeed. If Muslims, Jews and Christians of all denominations can work
together for peace, certainly Evangelical and liberal Quakers can do likewise!
The
only disappointment I have with this book is the lack of a Quaker perspective.
All of the theologians included are “people of the book” who rely mainly upon
scriptural authority to justify their views. I would have loved to have seen at
least one theologian discuss the spiritual and experiential basis for just peacemaking.
It is our Quaker conviction that our peacemaking efforts are most effective
when they spring from an experience of inner peace, when we listen to our
Inward Guide and follow the leadings of the Spirit. This inward experience
leads to outward practices such as consensus decision making as well as to our
social testimonies (simplicity, equality, community), a way of life that fosters
peace and justice. Despite the omission of a Quaker perspective, I heartily recommend
this book to Friends and to others who have serious commitment to ending war
and promoting a just peace. I also look forward to a follow-up book that
includes those of non-Abrahamic faiths, such as a Buddhists, Bahais, Hindus
and others.
No comments:
Post a Comment