1) Advocate for Model A, not Model C, at Heritage Square South. We had a meeting with Pasadena Housing Director Bill Huang in which he told us that housing homeless seniors on Heritage Square South is far from a done deal. The devil is in the details. Model C (which Ed Tech recommended) says "housing," but that could mean market rate, or affordable, or permanent supportive housing or a combination of these—what was recommended does not spell out that it would specifically be for Permanent Supportive Housing( PSH). It calls for underground parking, which sounds good but may be not economically feasible since it costs over $30,000 per parking space. Model C would require a feasibility study and could take years to develop since there is nothing like it in NW Pasadena. Therefore, we need a big turnout again when Heritage Square South comes up for consideration by the whole City Council so we can advocate for Model A, which definitely specifies permanent supportive housing and surface parking for a modest amount of retail space (preferably medical offices). We also need to contact individual City members to let them know our talking points. Please review the letter below before it is sent to the CC. And please contact the City Council and let them know that you support Model A and the other points in this letter. Write to the city clerk: mjomsky@cityofpasadena.net,
1) Ordinance to facilitate motel conversion to permanent supportive housing needs our support. As you may have read in Monday's Star News, the Planning Committee and the City Council are considering an ordinance that would make it easier for the City to convert motels into permanent supportive housing. This is a very good policy, In order for this to happen, however, it is important that the city ordinance makes approval of these conversions "by right" or "ministerial," thereby avoiding a lengthy and time-consuming process involving environmental impact studies and community input that invites NYMBYism. Pease let us know if you are willing to go to the Planning Committee meeting on Aug 8th at 6:30pm to advocate for this policy.
2) Oppose over-concentration policy that will stifle city-funded affordable housing in NW Pasadena. Mr. Gordo wants the City Council to adopt a very bad policy that would curtail city-funded affordable housing in NW Pasadena due to "overconcentration," based on State Code Section 34176 1(c) (2).. As the data clearly shows, NW Pasadena has become gentrified and therefore needs more, not less, affordable housing to prevent increasing homelessness and displacement of long-term residents. Bill Huang (along with many other experts) points out: "Affordable housing in all its forms is the best way to combat gentrification." We need to convince the City Council to study the gentrification issue carefully before adopting a misguided and obsolete policy that would hurt the long-term low-income residents of NW Pasadena.
Here is a letter we are sending to the City Council on Aug 2:
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers:
Ed Tech's approval of Model C--housing and commercial development--is a step in the right direction, but we want to be sure that "housing" means "permanent supportive housing" (PSH) and not market rate housing. Market rate housing would require that the City forfeit $2.3 million to HUD and the state, and lose a golden opportunity to build PSH on a site ideal for housing homeless seniors. There is county, state and federal funding for PSH, not so much for affordable housing. Your constituents have made it very clear that we want permanent supportive housing on this site.
We have other practical concerns about Model C. It calls for 15-20 K of retail space with underground parking. Is this realistic? The cost of underground parking is approximately $30,000 or more per car. This would add considerable cost to retail rental. Is there a market for more retail development on this corner? The site of Blaze Pizza was vacant for 4 years. Rents on a site with underground parking would be much higher than one with surface parking. There would need to be a feasibility study to determine if Model C is economically viable.
We feel that Model A is more realistic. It calls for 69 units of affordable housing and 15-30 spaces for surface parking and a modest amount of commercial development. If we house 69 homeless seniors and have medical offices on the first floor, that number of parking spaces would probably suffice. We could move forward with Model A without a lengthy and time-consuming feasibility study.
It is important for the city to come up with a realistic plan expeditiously so this project doesn't drag on for years, as has happened in the past. Permanent supportive housing is fundable now and we can access millions in non-city funds that would provide an immediate economic boost to our area since affordable housing requires that 20% of those hired are local, 20% are local contracts and 20% local materials.. The number of homeless seniors is increasing at an alarming rate so we need this housing as soon as possible. The latest figures for San Gabriel Valley show that the number of homeless seniors 62 years old and older has gone up 116% in the past year. Pasadena's homeless senior rate has gone up 58% in the last three years. Housing homeless seniors is a crisis that needs to be addressed now. That's why we recommend that the City Council approve Model A.
We also strongly urge the City Council not to adopt a policy based on Code Section 34176 1(c) (2) that would greatly restrict building affordable housing in Northwest Pasadena due to "overconcentration." This is not what your constituents want and it is not good policy. As the data clearly shows, NW Pasadena has become gentrified and therefore needs more, not less, affordable housing to prevent increasing homelessness and displacement of long-term residents.
Before adopting any policy changes like this, we need input from the Northwest Commission and from residents. We are quite certain that the residents of NW Pasadena do not want you to stop building affordable housing in this area where rents are skyrocketing and the African American community and others are being priced out.