Monday, July 23, 2018

Shining our Quaker Light on the Immigration Crisis

I was deeply moved by what was shared by members of the Latin American Concerns Committee of Pacific Yearly Meeting during this year's annual session at Walker Creek Ranch. One of the speakers was Miguel Ángel Costop, Director Progresa (Guatemala Friends Scholarship Program), which our Yearly Meeting has supported for many years. He put into perspective the root causes of migration, seen from a Central American perspective. Patricia Portillo, who heads a scholarship program for undocumented students in Sacramento, shared her heart-rending personal story of being born and raised in Salvador during the Civil War there, and how traumatic it was for her to be separated from her family. Finally, Donna Smith, clerk (chair) of the Latin American Concerns Committee, shared her perspective, based on many years volunteering  in a free clinic in Los Angeles for Central American refugee children and working for Child Welfare in a largely Hispanic community. These testimonies shed profound light on the current crisis facing our country with children being snatched away from their parents simply because they have arrived in our country without proper documents. 

I was especially struck by the words of Miguel Costep since as a Yearly Meeting, we no longer are making public statements about matters of social justice: 


It is true, as Friends, we have fought a lot to achieve that inner light, but are we taking the additional step to radiate that light, to share it with others and illuminate our world?  Am really I doing what is needed, what the Spirit needs me to do in order to illuminate this darkness, this painful darkness that is being put onto many that come here with the only purpose of looking for a better life?

          Given the extent of this crisis, how can we remain silent? How can we not take action? I am grateful that many monthly meetings are making public statements and seeking ways to take action to address this address. This is our responsibility as Friends and as human beings. Let us take to heart these powerful words by Donna Smith:
Our callings are many and varied and there is beauty to that.  Whatever the calling that you pursue, we are asking that at this time and place for you participate in some action on behalf of immigrants and refugee seekers from Latin America.  It can be writing a letter or 10 letters.  You are hearing about asylum can be requested at “points of entry”.  Not true 8 US Code 1158 of asylum law states that “Any alien who is physically present in the United States…may apply for asylum.” That deserves its own letter.  It can be joining a demonstration.  Raising money for Dreamer scholarships.  Making a donation to an agency involved in this work.  Offering sanctuary or sponsorship to a refugee OR assisting others that are providing sanctuary or sponsorship.  Be a witness in immigration court.  Join a Rapid Response Network.  There are many meaningful ways to participate.  This is a time when we may be most effective in bringing about meaningful change.  Now before this concern fades from public attention.  Many of you are already deeply engaged.  Thank you.


Presentation of the Latin American Concerns Committee
PYM Plenary Session July 17, 2017

CURRENT IMMIGRATION CRISIS

Root Causes of Migration

When I was a child and went to the field to work, my father used to take a fist of earth in his hands and repeated: "Ala 'ja re' ri qa k'aslem, ja re 'ri nu ya' ri qa q'utun, ri qa wäy Manta ri loq'oläj ulew roj man yoj k'aseta. Ru ma 'ri' ma yoj tikirta nqa ya kan la q'a ulew "- Son, this is our life, this is what gives us the food, our tortillas. If it were not for the sacred earth, we would not live. That's why we should not separate from her.
In the Mayan worldview, man needs the earth, not only as a possession but as an integral part of his very being. For that reason, the separation of our people from their land, from their family, from their roots is something that causes tremendous pain in individuals, families and entire communities. Understanding this is sometimes difficult for other cultures but is a tremendous truth for us.
A few weeks ago, the Vice President of the United States visited Guatemala as part of a tour to several Latin American countries. The presidents of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras were present at this meeting. The main message that our presidents heard was a threat not to come to the United States or to face the consequences:
"This exodus must end," "Tell your people that coming to the United States illegally will only result in a hard journey and a harder life."
I believe that the authorities of this country have made a great effort to stop and criminalize the arrival of more migrants to this country. Millions of dollars are invested for this purpose, but I wonder how much money and effort is invested to know the roots and reasons of the migratory problem? The vice president of the US also said in his statement:
"Just as we respect your borders and sovereignty, we insist that you respect ours," Pence said. "Our nation needs your nations to do more."
Then, he demanded that our governments fight corruption, violence and drug trafficking to reduce inequalities in our countries.
However, has the US government forgotten that they themselves have a great responsibility in what is happening now in the countries of Latin America? Has it been forgotten that the US government has carried out a progressive and methodical intervention in these countries since the beginning of the 19th century with the installation of large companies that have taken advantage of the resources of Guatemalans.
Has it been forgotten that large areas of land were taken from entire communities to be granted to North American industries for the production of bananas, coffee, sugar and other products? He forgot that when our people wanted to raise their voices and claim these rights, we were called communists and lots of money, weapons and military training (to not say murder training) were sent to our countries to "save us from communism"
We are now accused of doing very little to control drug trafficking in our countries and that we must do more. But how much is done here to avoid the use of drugs, those same drugs that in their way to the Us leave so much pain and death in our countries?
How to talk about providing equality and opportunities for development when this capitalist and imperialist system has promoted that a small group in Latin America have lots of privileges and has accumulated enormous wealth, leaving the vast majority without what is necessary to live. How to talk about development if, in most cases, the first world societies do not share with us the access to technologies and knowledge that is developed here and, on the contrary, we are only given small crumbs to silence our voices.
I know that what has happened in all this time has not been the responsibility of all the residents of this wonderful country and that, as happens in our country, a few have created great fortunes of all this inequality and have caused many to suffer in other parts of the world. However, it is also true that we all have a collective responsibility for what happens in our world. The Religious Society of Friends puts a lot of emphasis and reflection on the internal light that should guide our steps and act correctly. That is wonderful and I must say, Quakerism is one of the most authentic Christian spiritualities I have experienced, but is it enough? During these days we have been questioned about our leaving our comfort zone and witnessing into a troubled world.  After a deep discernment these words of Jesus come strong to my spirit:

14 "You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden.15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven "Mathew 7

It is true, as friends, we have fought a lot to achieve that inner light, but are we taking the additional step to radiate that light, to share it with others and illuminate our world?  Am really I doing what is needed, what the Spirit needs me to do in order to illuminate this darkness, this painful darkness that is being put onto many that come here with the only purpose of looking for a better life?

Miguel Ángel Costop, Director Progresa (Guatemala Friends Scholarship Program)

CHARLA SOBRE MIGRACIÓN --- ESPAÑOL

Cuando era pequeño e íbamos al campo a trabajar, mi padre solía tomar un puño de tierra en sus manos y repetía: “Ala’ ja re’ ri qa k’aslem, ja re’ ri nu ya’ ri qa q’utun, ri qa wäy.  Manta ri loq’oläj ulew roj man yoj k’aseta.  Ru ma’ ri’ manaq modo nqa ya ta kan la q’a chulew”  -  Hijo, esta es nuestra vida, esto es lo que nos da el alimento, la tortilla.  Si no fuera por la sagrada tierra, no viviríamos.  Por eso no podemos separarnos de ella, de nuestra tierra.
En la cosmovisión maya, el hombre necesita de la tierra, no solo como una posesión sino como parte integral de su mismo ser.  Por esa razón, la separación de nuestra gente de su tierra, de su familia, de sus raíces es algo que causa un tremendo dolor en las personas individuales, las familias y comunidades enteras.
Hace unas semanas, el vicepresidente de los Estados Unidos visitó Guatemala como parte de una gira a varios países de Latinoamérica.  En esta reunión estuvieron presentes los presidentes de Guatemala, El Salvador y Honduras.  El mensaje principal que nuestros presidentes escucharon fue una amenaza para no venir a los Estados Unidos o atenerse a las consecuencias:
“This exodus must end,”  “Tell your people that coming to the United States illegally will only result in a hard journey and a harder life.”
Creo que las autoridades de este país han hecho un gran esfuerzo en parar y criminalizar la llegada de más migrantes a este país.  Se invierten millones de dólares para este propósito, pero yo me pregunto ¿Cuánto dinero y esfuerzo se invierte para conocer las raíces y razones del problema migratorio? El vicepresidente de US dijo además en su declaración:
“Just as we respect your borders and your sovereignty, we insist that you respect ours,” Pence said. “Our nation needs your nations to do more.”
Luego, él exigió a los gobiernos combatir la corrupción, la violencia y el narcotráfico para reducir las desigualdades en estos países.
Sin embargo, ha olvidado el gobierno de los US que ellos mismos tienen una gran responsabilidad en lo que pasa ahora en los países de Latinoamérica? Se ha olvidado acaso que el gobierno norteamericano ha realizado un progresivo y metódico intervencionismo en estos países desde inicios del siglo 19 con la instalación de grandes empresas que se han aprovechado de los recursos de los guatemaltecos. 
Ha quedado en el olvido que se quitó grandes extensiones de tierra a comunidades enteras para concederlas a industrias norteamericanas para la producción de banano, café, azúcar y otros productos?  Se olvidó ya que cuando nuestros pueblos quisieron alzar la voz y reclamar tales derechos se nos llamó comunistas y se envió dinero, armas y se entrenó a militares en nuestros países para “salvarnos del comunismo”? 
Se nos acusa ahora de que hacemos poco por controlar el tráfico de drogas en nuestros países y que debemos hacer más.  Pero cuánto se hace aquí por evitar el consumo de drogas, esas mismas drogas que a su paso dejan tanto dolor y muerte en su camino hasta acá?
Cómo hablar de proporcionar igualdad y oportunidades de desarrollo cuando este sistema capitalista e imperialista ha promovido que algunos pocos en Latinoamérica tengan grandes beneficios y acumulen la riqueza y dejen a la gran mayoría sin lo necesario para vivir.  Cómo hablar de desarrollo si en la mayoría de los casos no se comparte con nosotros el acceso a tecnologías y conocimiento que aquí se desarrolla y por el contrario solo se nos dan pequeñas migajas para callar en algo nuestras voces.
Yo se que lo que ha sucedido en todo este tiempo no ha sido responsabilidad de todos los residents de este maravilloso país y que al igual que sucede en nuestro país, unos pocos han creado grandes fortunas de toda esta desigualdad y han hecho que muchos sufran en otras partes del mundo.  Sin embargo, también es cierto que todos tenemos una responsabilidad colectiva por lo que pasa en nuestra sociedad.  Como sociedad religiosa de los amigos se hace mucha reflexión sobre la luz interna que debe guiar nuestros pasos y actuar correctamente.  Al pensar en esto recuerdo aquello que Jesús dijo en el evangelio de Mateo:
14 “ustedes son la luz del mundo. Una ciudad construida sobre una colina no puede ser escondida. Tampoco se enciende una lámpara para esconderla debajo de una olla.  Más bien se coloca en un candelero para que ilumine a todos en la casa.  Del mismo modo piensan que su luz brille ante otros para que al ver sus obras glorifiquen a su Padre que está eran los cielos.” Mateo 7, 14-16
Es cierto, como amigos hemos luchado mucho por lograr conseguir esa luz interior, pero ¿estamos dando el paso adicional para irradiar esa luz, para compartirla con otros e iluminar nuestro mundo? ¿estoy haciendo realmente lo que se necesita, lo que el Espíritu necesita que yo haga para iluminar esta oscuridad, está dolorosa oscuridad que se posado sobre tantos que han venido aquí con el único propósito de tener una mejor forma de vida?
Miguel Ángel Costop, director Progresa
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Patricia Portillo
Latin American Concerns Committee
In charge of the Undocumented Student Scholarship Project
Sacramento Friends Meeting

On Sunday morning I spoke about my experience being left behind in El Salvador, as a 12-year-old during the war.  One year of family separation at such a pivotal time in my life left irreversible damage in me. The reason that I am OK today is that I was reunited and cared for by my parents and my siblings. 
At age 13, I was smuggled in the trunk of a car. There wasn’t any hope of political asylum or refugee status. Men, women, and children were fleeing war as well as extreme poverty.  
In the 80’s and 90’s due to the US government’s financial and political support of the war in El Salvador and Guatemala, the US denied refugee status to people coming from those countries. 
 Without appropriate resources, some of these immigrants, young boys in particular, finding themselves in a strange country and looking for a place to fit in, joined gangs as a way of forming community, which turned violent within a system that did not recognize their basic needs. 
After we left El Salvador there was a tremendous sense of loss for the many places where I walked on a daily basis, for the rain, the smell of ripe mangoes and for jocotes, for teachers, friends, and for my cousins.  In the next five years I would often wake up from a horrifying often-times recurring nightmare, which I would do my best to forget once I got up to go to school. I couldn’t bear to watch the news at night because they took me back, back to the time and places where I heard shootings, bombings, smelled bodies decomposing and where twice my cousins and I had to leave the house and go hide in the wilderness in the dark so that the armed men at the door would not see us and be tempted to rape us. 
I have visited El Salvador since I left. A couple of things come to mind regarding the injustices that I saw. When I look around, it is easy to distinguish the children who have relatives in the US and the ones who don’t, because being same age, the ones who don’t have relatives in the US, are much smaller than the one who do. 
We went to visit my sister’s friend. Her brother owned a small warehouse supplying seeds and small tools to nearby farmers. As she explained to us, her brother had to fire someone recently, and just a few days later they got a threatening call demanding money or the owner would be killed. This practice is so common that you if you plan to own any type of business, no matter how small, you expect that you will have to pay some (if not a lot) of extortion money, commonly called “rent” to organized gangs, gangs which will not hesitate to take someone’s life to exert their power. Everyone is constantly on high alert everywhere. The level of fear is as high as I remember it as a child. 
My friend (who by the way earns $300 a month as a teacher) would not allow me to go visit her in her neighborhood out of fear that something would happen to me.  
We were shocked to see how expensive it was to live there. And, today a gallon of milk costs $4.79 and a dozen eggs $1.85. An average salary is $415 (if you happen to have a job) and a mortgage interest rate is 8.3%. 
When you look around, you see malls, City Bank, McDonald’s, and you may get a sense that things have changed, but it doesn’t take long to realize that things have not changed much. There are many maquiladoras (sweat shops) and call centers and access to higher education is hard to come by. This is the environment where violence is a vicious cycle that ends up hurting women and children the most, because they are the ones with the least amount of any kind of power. 
_________________________________________________________

From Pacific Yearly Meeting, Faith and Practice

How do we attend to the suffering of others in our community, in our state and nation, and in the world community?

Community is a place where the connections felt in the heart make themselves known in bonds between people, and where tuggings and pullings of those bonds keep opening up our hearts.
Parker Palmer

I volunteered for 15 years in a free clinic in Los Angeles for Central American refugee children.  As the immunization nurse, I diligently asked for their vaccination records, as I wanted to avoid unnecessary vaccinations.  A woman and child from El Salvador came without any records.  I asked if they might have just left the records at home.  She responded, Yes, in El Salvador.  We fled from our home in the middle of the night with only what we were wearing.  There was much in the news about similar stories, but this was different.  This was witness to the violence right there in front of me and it has not left me.
My career was in Child Welfare otherwise known as Child Protective Service. My office in Los Angeles covered a major Central American community and I was supervisor of a bilingual unit of social workers. 
You have heard from Patricia a moving account of the pain and scars from being left behind has her mother and sisters sought safety in the US.  Thankfully, their reunion was successful.  There are thousands of these stories of child/parent separation.  A parent travels to the US in hopes of providing a better future for the family and with the best of intentions, leaves their child with a grandparent or aunt, what can go wrong.  A lot.  Eventually those children leave their relatives and are reunited with their parents in the US.  The years of separation take a toll on the parent-child bond.  The family is broken.  Many, too many end up in the CPS system with the child yet again separated from parent for their safety.  A plan is made between CPS and the family with the goal of safe reunification.  And while counseling and other services usually are successful, some families tragically are never able to overcome the damage that has been done.  And the family remains broken.
I imagine you heard the recent news story about the Guatemalan boy who went into foster care as an infant and at age 5 was adopted by his foster parents over the objection of his mother.
After moving to Sonoma County, I worked as a Juvenile Court Investigator.  It is common for immigrants with limited resources to rent houses together with a different family living in each room.  I received the case of a one year old that was placed in foster care.  Her mother had been sent to jail when the police raided her home and arrested everyone.  Someone in the home was involved in criminal activity.  But this child’s mother wasn’t involved.  She was merely working and trying to support her child.  No charges were ever filed against this mother. But at the time Sonoma sheriff was cooperating with ICE and because she was at the jail, an immigration hold was placed on her and she was deported leaving her child behind.  This child could have ended up adopted here and never reunited with family.  In Los Angeles, our practice in such cases was to contact the appropriate consulate and request a social study be done to assess suitability of placement with relatives.  After receiving the social study we then would ask the court for an order to return the child to family.  That hadn’t been done before in Sonoma County but it did become their practice.  If the exploration of reunification with family in the country of origin were a regulatory requirement, fewer immigrant children would be permanently severed from family.   By the way, the child I mentioned remained in placement for almost 2 years, but I was able to reunite her to her family in Morelia, Mexico.  
In 2014, this yearly meeting organized around the migration of unaccompanied children after their plight was very much in the headlines.  We gathered and sub committee of Latin American Concerns was formed.  It was active for over a year meeting twice a month.  Maryanne Michaels and I accompanied a child through to asylum status.  I learned from our child of the conditions where she was housed for her first month.  Sleeping on a filthy floor with no blanket, no medical care, freezing temperature—it was called the refrigerator, highly chlorinated water to drink.  She was a teenager and repeatedly expressed concern for the suffering of young children and pregnant teenagers imprisoned with her.  They say that children are only in these federal detentions for a couple days.  She was there for over a month.  Those conditions constitute child abuse.  These federal and private prison facilities need to comply with the usual regulations and standards that are required in other facilities that house minors.
The current headlines of children being separated from their parents at our border have caught our attention.  We are deeply pained and brought to tears by the faces of these innocent children and their grieving parents.  Loving parents came to the United States with hopes of protecting their children from violence and/or escaping from the kind of no hope, no way out poverty that results in malnutrition, stunted growth, untreated health issues and a life of brutal slave labor.  These families came to us out of desperation and at great expense and risk, only to find their children ripped from their arms.  Where is the humanity? 

 “When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.”  Leviticus 19:33-34

I have been encouraged by the mobilization of efforts to end this horrendous act of cruelty and blatant violation of human rights perpetrated by our government.  And while we must take action to end this new policy, the serious trauma to children and families that has been part and parcel of immigration from Mexico and Central America has been going on for years.
As we heard from Miguel, The root causes are not being addressed and threats from our political leaders are not how meaningful change happens.
As Friends we are called.  It was in elementary school that I was called to Guatemala when my First Day schoolteacher at Montebello Friends Church left for the mission field in Guatemala. I have been blessed with work in the Guatemala Friends Scholarship Program.  I see first hand how education works as a successful and powerful implement of change by addressing root causes of injustice. 
Our callings are many and varied and there is beauty to that.  Whatever the calling that you pursue, we are asking that at this time and place for you participate in some action on behalf of immigrants and refugee seekers from Latin America.  It can be writing a letter or 10 letters.  You are hearing about asylum can be requested at “points of entry”.  Not true 8 US Code 1158 of asylum law states that “Any alien who is physically present in the United States…may apply for asylum.” That deserves its own letter.  It can be joining a demonstration.  Raising money for Dreamer scholarships.  Making a donation to an agency involved in this work.  Offering sanctuary or sponsorship to a refugee OR assisting others that are providing sanctuary or sponsorship.  Be a witness in immigration court.  Join a Rapid Response Network.  There are many meaningful ways to participate.  This is a time when we may be most effective in bringing about meaningful change.  Now before this concern fades from public attention.  Many of you are already deeply engaged.  Thank you.
We will be posting A CALL TO ACTION on the PYM web site.   We will be listing resources and suggestions.  If you are involved in this work already or know of resources in your area, let me know and we will add to the list.  Please join us.
“For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me.” Matthew 25:35

Can I hear PRESENTE?

Donna Smith, Redwood Forest Meeting, Co-clerk, Guatemala Scholarship Comm.
Clerk, PYM Latin American Concerns Committee     

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Our Quaker witness: a personal testimony during a dark time



Pacific Yearly Meeting's annual session has not approved any statements about social justice or peace (aka "minutes of concern")  for the last three years. In fact, we don't even have an agreed upon procedure for doing so.  In 2014, the Peace and Social Order Committee of PYM approved a set of procedures that reflected our best practices over many decades (see  Procedures).

Unfortunately, Ministry and Oversight had concerns about this process and requested that no minutes of concern be sent to the YM session until new procedures were approved by the body. M and O came up with their own set of procedures, which began by stating that minutes of concern are ineffective and do not result in action on either the personal or corporate level.


We are concerned that these minutes do not result in action on the part of our Monthly Meetings nor cause our personal lives to change. Minutes of Concern seem to end after the Yearly Meeting approves them and there is no ongoing relationship of accountability with the Yearly Meeting nor engagement with the Monthly or Quarterly Meetings. We believe that Minutes of Concern should be the beginning of a process that engages the Monthly and Quarterly Meetings thus extending the scope and effectiveness of a concern and leading to changes in our lives. 

My experience as an activist and clerk of Peace and Social Order has been very different from what M and O alleges, as I made clear in my statement during a YM plenary session. However, I do agree that the procedures could be improved upon, especially in the area of accountability.

After a year of discernment, M and O recommended procedures that were not acceptable to any of the activist committees (Quaker Earthcare Witness, Peace and Social Order or Latin American Concerns). So Pacific Yearly Meeting Friends ended up not having a way even to consider making a statement about peace and justice concerns for the past three years. 

For some Friends, this is not a problem since they feel that the minutes were not effective and created contention. But others such as myself feel this inability to speak out on issues of social justice and peace is a huge loss, especially during this time when our Quaker values and commitments are under constant assault from the Trump administration and when the need for our Quaker prophetic voice is so great. 

I am grateful that the PYM clerk Diego Navarro allowed time during a plenary session for speakers (including myself) to discuss our Quaker public witness. I am including what I shared because I feel that our Quaker witness needs to be heard in our troubled world, and (as Dr. King said) "silence is betrayal." 

I also take to heart these powerful words by Miguel Ángel Costop, Director Progresa (Guatemala Friends Scholarship Program). This is what he said at our YM session regarding the need to speak out about social justice: 

It is true, as friends, we have fought a lot to achieve that inner light, but are we taking the additional step to radiate that light, to share it with others and illuminate our world?  Am really I doing what is needed, what the Spirit needs me to do in order to illuminate this darkness, this painful darkness that is being put onto many that come here with the only purpose of looking for a better life?

Although PYM didn't approve any minutes of concern, this year's PYM Epistle does reflect some of the passion for social justice and peace that I felt at this year's annual session:


The context of our gathering is that of a world on fire: a global refugee crisis, ecological crisis, increasing economic disparity, militarization of police, and an ongoing opioid crisis. How do we embody our Quaker witness during these troubled times? We are increasingly aware of our obligation to do what we can to end poverty and the war system. We seek to work together, allowing our hearts to be broken open by the Spirit, to respond to these social injustices in our deeply wounded nation  
During a plenary session, five Friends shared different perspectives on how our Yearly Meeting could publicly express our social justice concerns effectively and with integrity, guided by Spirit and grounded in love. Interest groups challenged people to go deeper into these issues, preparing for actions. Friends shared what their meetings are doing to address this growing crisis.Two Claremont Friends described how their Meeting is housing otherwise unsheltered guests in their meetinghouse every night of the year and providing them with supportive services. This kind of work transforms those who make themselves available to do it, enlivening our spiritual core. Many Meetings have expressed concern for our undocumented neighbors and for families separated at the border, through minutes of concern and actions.
The Clerk of Latin American Concerns Committee offered recommendations on what Friends can do:
1. Visit detention centers.
 2. Be a witness in immigration hearings.
3. Accompany an asylum seeker through the court process.
4. Become a sanctuary or support sanctuaries in your area.
5. Sponsor an immigrant or support sponsors in your area.
We have more to do and more to learn. What can love do? What can we do? Are we open to the leadings of the Spirit? 
***
I'm grateful that we are taking small but not insignificant steps towards reclaiming our Quaker voice of conscience during our YM annual session through our Epistle. I hope that the time will come when we can speak out boldly and with confidence, inspired by the same Spirit that animated early Friends to proclaim (and live) our Peace Testimony. I believe that when we are grounded in Spirit, and willing to be courageously (and outrageously) faithful, our Quaker witness can transform the world.


Our Quaker witness: a personal testimony during a dark time

By Anthony Manousos

I am very grateful and glad that I have been given this opportunity to speak to Pacific YM about Quaker witness and minutes of concern. I feel there is a great deal of misunderstanding about minutes of concern among those who have never experienced their usefulness and power. I will speak out of my own experience. I can do so because I have helped to craft many minutes of concern over the years and been part of the process of getting them approved. I love this process of discernment when it is conducted in a friendly and loving manner. I even appreciate conflict when it comes from a place of compassion and commitment to truth. To ask one’s Meeting for support is to become vulnerable to the Spirit and to the moods of Friends, some of whom may not feel the same passion that we feel and may react in hurtful ways. But unless we’re willing to take this risk, we never discover the power and joy that comes from feeling the love and support of our Meeting as we seek to follow the leading of the Spirit.
Some Friends feel that minute of concern are basically ineffective and produce no results. Since becoming part of Orange Grove Meeting, I have seen how minutes of concern have strengthened our Meeting and encouraged those called to social justice work. When Orange Grove Meeting adopted the climate change minute that was approved in Peru by FWCC, and affirmed by our Yearly Meeting, Orange Grove Friends began to think more seriously about our energy use. This minute asked us to take two concrete actions. After much discernment, and consultation with Claremont Meeting, Orange Grove Friends decided to purchase all green electrical power and install solar panels. This was a huge breakthrough. Fifteen years ago the Wolffs offered to give Orange Grove Meeting free solar panels and were turned down. Approving this PYM/FWCC minute inspired Orange Grove Friends and led us to take action that brought us together as a community. This made me and others very happy.
My wife Jill is not a Quaker but she loves Quaker process. She is passionate about housing justice, and has been warmly embraced by Orange Grove’s vibrant and loving Peace and Social Concerns Committee. Over the years we’ve approved minutes of concern about rent control, a Housing Commission, and similar housing related issues. These minutes have enabled Jill to appreciate the power of Quaker corporate discernment. We value having the support of Meeting when we go to City Council Meetings, or when our Advocacy Team meets with our elected officials about averting war with North Korea. Only a few Orange Grove members actively take part in our efforts, but we appreciate their support. We’re also grateful for those who support us with prayers and words of encouragement.
One misunderstanding that I’d like to address is that if a minute of concern is approved, every Friend must take action or else the minute lacks integrity.  I’ve heard Friends say this at our Yearly Meeting, but I think Santa Monica Friends provided a thoughtful response when it approved a minute on families separated at the border. Santa Monica Friends noted that approving a minute “does not require all friends and attenders to act. The commitment of the Meeting is to provide support and blessing to all who choose to take action…. Our actions are enhanced through the community, knowing that we speak and act not just as individual Quakers, but on behalf of and with the strength of the commitment of our Santa Monica Meeting.”
These words ring true and speak to my condition and experience. Now I must be vulnerable and tell you I have felt great disappointment and sadness that our Yearly Meeting has not approved any minutes of concern during a period when our government is doing horrendous and immoral things almost daily. I often reflect on the words of Dr. King who said in his famous speech at Riverside Church: “Sometimes silence is betrayal.” To say nothing publicly when children are being snatched from their parents, when funds are being slashed from programs that help the poor, when the military budget is escalating beyond reason, and when our environmental protections are being stripped away, feels excruciatingly painful and un-Quakerly to me. I miss and yearn for our prophetic Quaker voice of conscience. I personally can’t help speaking out and working for justice and peace during this dark time.  I would like to do so with the support and blessing of my Yearly Meeting as well as my monthly meeting. That’s why I recommend that this Yearly Meeting approved the procedures for seasoning and presenting minutes of concern that Peace and Social Order approved four years ago and posted on the PYM website. Ministry and Oversight felt that these procedures needed to be improved upon, and I agree. I propose, however, that we accept them for one year so we have procedures we can use until M and O and PSO agree on improvements and submit them to the YM for your consideration. My prayer is that Yearly Meeting will speak out boldly and clearly for social justice and peace and support those who are called to take risks, be vulnerable and witness to our Quaker faith.

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Urge Pasadena's Ed Tech Committee to recommend homeless housing at Heritage Square South



On Tuesday, July 17, at 5:30 pm the Economic Development and Technology Committee of the Pasadena City Council will consider how to utilize Heritage Square South, a property purchased with HUD and other funding fifteen years ago for affordable housing. For political reasons, it has been left vacant, despite the urgent need for affordable housing. In March, 2018, Vice Mayor John Kennedy brought this issue up along with a report from the Housing Department recommending the the site be used to house homeless seniors, but some Council members want  to sell the property to a commercial developer and forfeit over  a million dollars to HUD!  The Council couldn't make up its mind so it asked Ed Tech to study the matter and come up with a proposal.

Please come to this crucial meeting and/or write to the City Council urging them to approve using Heritage Square South for homeless housing. Here's a sample letter:


Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilmember I want to commend Vice Mayor John Kennedy for bringing to the attention of the City Council the South Heritage Square Property, which is a designated “affordable housing asset.” I also want to thank William Huang for his study showing that most needed and most easily fundable use of this property is for permanent supportive housing for homeless seniorsI support mixed use of this property, using the first floor for commercial development, and the top two floors for supportive housing for homeless seniors.
[Say something about yourself, for example: “I am a retired school teacher who lives in Councilmember Gordo’s district, or who attends church or works in Pasadena.”]


Choose one of the following talking points and either cut and paste it or express it in your own words. Send your email to mjomsky@cityofpasadena.net.

Here are the talking points:

  1. Homeless housing makes a community safer and is good for business.  
  2. Overconcentration is not a problem for gentrifying areas like Northwest Pasadena. According to our Housing Director, “Affordable housing in all its forms is the best way to combat gentrification.” Furthermore, the overconcentration policy doesn’t apply to Heritage Square South since it is not an inclusionary project.
  3. Homeless housing is a better option for this neighborhood than selling this property for exclusively commercial development and forfeiting over a million dollars to HUD.
  4. Selling this property for commercial development doesn’t make economic sense. It makes sense to invest in the community with a city-funded project.
  5. This project has overwhelming support of the community in Vice Mayor John Kennedy's District. 
  6.  Mixed use is the best approach, especially since this is a corner lot at a vibrant commercial intersection
  7. This site is ideal for homeless seniors, according to our Housing Director.
  8. We can be sure that those housed in Heritage Square South supportive housing will be from Pasadena.
  9. With a city-funded homeless housing project, we can guarantee it will generate local jobs and beautify the neighborhood. There is no guarantee that exclusively commercial development will generate a single job for Pasadena residents.
  10. The need for supportive housing for Pasadena’s homeless residents is growing rapidly and needs to be addressed now.
  11. There are huge financial benefits for housing homeless seniors.

Talking Point #1: Homeless housing makes a community safer and is good for business.  Mr Madison, we know that you are concerned about public safety and that’s why we feel you should support housing homeless seniors at Heritage Square South.  Mr. Huang, our Housing produced a video showing why permanent supportive housing benefits a community. This documentary makes it clear why police support permanent supportive housing. Police would rather be apprehending real criminals than hassling homeless people. A police sergeant in Sacramento was quoted recently as saying, “You can’t arrest your way out of homelessness.” Retired Police Chief Sanchez was a big supporter of affordable housing. He said, “Despite some of the stereotypes, affordable housing doesn’t impact crime. It doesn’t erode the quality of life. They’re highly regulated. They are highly monitored.” Lieutenant Mark Goodman, added, “The safety level is actually enhanced, because you are taking people from off the street and putting them into a situation that’[1]s stable.”’
Studies confirm that housing the homeless deters crime and makes our communities safer. The Justice Policy Institute states: “An increase in spending on housing is associated with a decrease in violent crime at the national level and a decrease in incarceration rates at the state level An increase in spending on housing and community development paired with a decrease in spending on corrections is associated with both lower crime rates and lower prison incarceration rates’” [2]In other words, the more you spend on affordable and homeless housing, the less you need to spend on jails!
This makes sense. When homeless people are in permanent supportive housing, they can receive help with their substance abuse issues and are less likely to commit petty crimes.
Housing the homeless is also good for business.
 In this documentary Paul Little, CEO of the Pasadena Chamber of Commerce, said, “Local businesses don’t feel the impact of permanent supportive housing. If there is an impact, it’s a positive one because there are fewer people in doorways, fewer people sleeping on sidewalks, or under bridges.”
The documentary provides perspectives from realtors, homeowners, and housing advocates, all of whom agree that permanent affordable housing is not only good for homeless people, it is also good for the community.
We have canvassed businesses around South Heritage Square who agree and have signed petitions supporting homeless housing on this site. They would like to see homeless people off the streets and housed with dignity. They agree with Paul Little and the police that permanent supportive housing is good for business and makes our community safer.  

Talking Point 2. Overconcentration is not a problem for gentrifying areas like Northwest Pasadena. According to our Housing Director, “Affordable housing in all its forms is the best way to combat gentrification.” I am here to speak on behalf of housing homeless at Heritage Square South. I’d like first to clarify a policy matter regarding over concentration of affordable housing in Northwest Pasadena.
Mr. Gordo has brought up the issue of over concentration as a reason not to have homeless housing at Heritage Square South,
It is important to note, however, that this policy applies only to off-site inclusionary affordable housing projects, such as the one that Mr. Gordo wanted to replace a blighted liquor store in his district. Under the inclusionary policy passed by the City Council in 2001, such a site could not be developed with inclusionary funds. The Council decided to pass an exception for this project and also for the Lincoln project. Both are affordable home ownership projects.
I think that the City Council was wise to make these exceptions since Northwest Pasadena needs more affordable housing. For a similar reason, it would also be wise to allow homeless housing to be built at Heritage Square South.
But Heritage Square South is not an inclusionary offsite project, so there is no need to make an exception to current policy.[3] I have checked with Bill Huang as well as with the wording of the policy, and it is very clear that it doesn’t apply in this case.
 With the help of Kim Douglas, a retired Cal Tech reference library who now serves on the Northwest Commission, my husband and I have written a report showing that the overconcentration policy is obsolete and needs to end in Northwest Pasadena. The policy no longer makes sense because Northwest Pasadena has become gentrified and there is an urgent need for more affordable housing in Northwest Pasadena so that “legacy” residents including the African American and Latino community aren’t forced to leave.
 Not only do we want to end blight of a defunct gas station and a problem liquor store, we need to end the blight of homelessness and prevent so many from being displaced from NW Pasadena. William Huang has stated, “Affordable housing in all its forms is the best way to combat gentrification.”

Talking Point 3: Homeless housing is a better option for this neighborhood than selling this property for exclusively commercial development and forfeiting over a million dollars.  Mr Gordo, I know you care deeply about creating a family-friendly neighborhood and you are also pro-union since you served as an attorney for the Laborers’ International Union of North America. That’s why we feel you should support permanent supportive housing for homeless seniors at North Heritage.
As you know, there are many elderly seniors living on the streets in your district and they have nowhere to go. Many are long-term residents of this area who have ended up on the street because of rising rents. If we could house 69 of them at Heritage Square North, it would improve the quality of life for all residents in your neighborhood. I am sure you are aware that homeless people forced to sleep on the street can create unsanitary conditions and disturb families and businesses.
Your constituents do not like seeing homeless people in their area. That’s why when Vice Mayor Kennedy asked residents what they wanted at Heritage Square South, 80% wanted homeless housing and 80% opposed selling this affordable housing asset for exclusively commercial use. Your constituents have the right idea. It is much better to house our homeless neighbors with dignity than to let them live on the streets. Getting homeless seniors off the streets of Northwest Pasadena will make our community safer for families and better for business. 
Talking Point #4: Selling this property for commercial development doesn’t make economic sense. It makes sense to invest in the community. I’m sure you all realize that your constituents are very upset that the City Council gave away nearly half a million dollars in funds slated for homeless housing because it didn’t have a homeless or very low income project in the pipeline. Your constituents will be even more outraged if you decide to sell Heritage Square South and forfeit $1.3 million dollars to HUD. If this property is sold to a commercial developer, not only would the City lose 1.3 million in HUD funding, we would lose the opportunity to ensure that construction is done by union labor that will pay a fair wage. If this property is sold for commercial development, there is no guarantee that there will local hires, local contractors, or local materials used. There is no way to compel a commercial developer to hire union labor. In fact, there is no way to guarantee that a commercial developer will hire a single Pasadena resident.  If this is s a city-funded project, we can require local hires, local contractors, and local materials. It will also require hiring workers at prevailing wage, which usually means union workers.  Heritage Square North generated 7 million dollars of economic development in the city of Pasadena. Bill Huang says it is possible to have commercial development and permanent supportive housing on this site, which would be even better for the community. The time to act is now while HUD and other funding is available for permanent supportive housing. As Andy Wilson said,   "We're eight years into an economic growth cycle, and I'm deeply concerned about the magnitude of this challenge when the economy's behind our backs. We really owe it to ourselves and our community to be clever now, when frankly we have the luxury to solve some of this without a gun to our heads, because I can imagine when the business cycle turns, what those homeless numbers are going to look like." Andy is right. We need to be clever now and approve using Heritage Square South for homeless housing.
Talking Point 5: Mixed use is the best approach, especially since this is a corner lot at a vibrant commercial intersection. GPAHG supports the idea of mixed use—commercial development plus homeless housing. According to Bill Huang, this is feasible. The corner of Los Robles and Orange Grove has mixed use on a corner lot and that’s true of most corner lots in Old Town. It actually makes more economic sense to have mixed use than to have a one-story commercial property, like the CVS on the corner of Orange Grove and Fair Oaks. Donna Hess, the property manager at Heritage Square North, has suggested medical offices on this site since it would require less parking and meet the needs of seniors. This would be a win-win for the community—create jobs and get our homeless seniors off the street.
Talking Point 6: This project has overwhelming support of the community in Vice Mayor John Kennedy's District.  In many areas of our City, NIMBYism prevents homeless housing from being built. Other than Margaret McAustin, I don’t know of any City Council member who is actively championing homeless housing in his district. But NIMBYism isn’t a problem in Northwest Pasadena. Residents here want affordable and homeless housing. During a community meet6ing in March, 80% of the community supported using this site for affordable housing and 80% opposed using this site only for commercial development. See Kennedy’s survey results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-25G2T2Y68/  Religious leaders and churches have signed over 400 letters in support of homeless housing for seniors, and two prayers vigil on the property attracted 20 and 60 people, many from the nearby neighborhood. The Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance, which comprises most of the African American churches in this area, supports using Heritage Square South for homeless housing.   We have gone door to door surveying businesses and neighbors and most were willing to sign petitions of support, which were sent to the City Council. 
Talking Point 7: This property is ideal for homeless seniors, according to our Housing Director. Supportive housing for seniors is the best option for this site because it is located on a busy commercial intersection, which is not ideal for families. Furthermore, families need more parking than do seniors and that would reduce the number of individuals who could be served, and also limit mixed use commercial development (restaurants require lots of parking). This site is better suited for seniors because it is close to already existing senior housing, a CVS, grocery stores and restaurants, and medical facilities (easily accessible by bus). Supportive housing for homeless seniors is fundable because of Measure H and other sources. Finally, the need is urgent, with the number of homeless seniors (those over 50 years of age) increasing 65% in three years, from 153 in 2016 to 253 in 2018. (Of these, 174 are unsheltered.)
Talking Point 8: We can be sure that those housed in Heritage Square South supportive housing will be from Pasadena. Mr. Hampton, we know that you are concerned that projects like these benefit the community you serve. According to Bill Huang, the City can give preference to Pasadena residents and to homeless seniors, of which there are 253 living on the streets of our city. It is likely that the vast majority of those housed will be homeless Pasadena seniors, many of whom will likely be from District 3. Almost all the current residents of Heritage Square North are from Northwest Pasadena. 30% are African American, 25% are Hispanic, 22% are Caucasians, and 18% are Asian. The 2018 Homeless Count shows that 36% of the homeless population are African American and 28% are Hispanic, and 48% are white. Very few homeless people are homeless. Heritage Square South will be a great benefit to the residents of Northwest Pasadena since it will house some of our homeless residents.
Talking Point 9: If the property is mixed use, including supportive housing, we can guarantee it will generate local jobs and beautify the neighborhood. I am speaking out in support of using Heritage Square South for homeless housing because it will benefit the economic development of our community and beautify the neighborhood. The City can require local hires for affordable and homeless housing. For Heritage Square North, 20% were local hires, and 60% of materials used were purchased locally.  Supportive housing would provide economic benefits to the local community in ways that commercial development could not guarantee. Heritage Square left $ 7 million in the City because of its policy to provide local contracts and supplies. Unlike city funded affordable housing projects, there is no requirement for commercial developers to hire local contractors. Nor are commercial ventures required to hire local employees. Therefore, commercial development would not necessarily provide any jobs for local residents nor would there be any requirement for material to be purchased locally. It makes much better economic sense for the City to invest in homeless housing in an area where such housing is urgently needed. . Furthermore, affordable housing like Summit Grove or Heritage Square North is not a stigma, but an asset to the community. They add beauty to the neighborhood.
Talking Point 10: The need for supportive housing for Pasadena’s homeless residents is growing rapidly. Homeless service providers have testified to this Council many times that the lack of homeless housing in this city is making very hard for them to find housing for those who are homeless. The number of unsheltered homeless residents in our City increased 33% in the past year. The number of homeless seniors has increased 65% in the past three years.  Since there is no supportive housing in the city pipeline, this number of homeless residents will undoubtedly increase over the next few years. There is a need to create multiple homeless housing projects, both short- and long-term.  Reducing our homeless population by providing housing will make our community safer and better for business.
Talking Point 11: There are huge financial benefits for housing homeless seniors. Homeless seniors are likely to cost society more money in health care than younger and healthier homeless residents. Given the City’s budget crunch, it makes more economic sense to house homeless seniors in facilities with services provided by the County’s Measure H funding than to let them sicken and die on the streets, with various agencies in the City footing enormous medical bills. A Rand study showed that housing homeless residents has saved the county $1.20 for every dollar spent on housing and supportive services. According to an Economic Roundtable study, the cost of dealing with a homeless individual in LA County is around $5038 per month, vs $605 per month when they are provided with supportive housing. These costs increase with the age of homeless individuals. Based on this study, we can estimate the cost to Pasadena of having 69 homeless seniors living on the street to be around $4,171,464 per year. Housing them in supportive housing would run around $500,940, a savings of $3,670,524. This would be a huge financial benefit to our City. 
Talking Point 12: Heritage Square South was originally intended for affordable housing and is considered an “affordable housing asset.” According to Bill Huang, the North and South Heritage Square property was originally purchased in different parcels over a period of time by the City with HUD and other funding for affordable housing, starting in 2004. For political reasons, it was bifurcated in 2011 with the understanding that Heritage Square North would be used for affordable senior housing, and the southern part primarily for commercial use. When the state ended Redevelopment, however, the City changed its tune. The state wanted the City to sell the property and give them the proceeds, but the City argued that the property was an affordable housing asset and would be used for affordable housing. The state allowed the City to keep the property for this purpose. The City’s intention for this property has shifted over time, but it is currently designated for affordable housing. If it is sold for commercial use, the City must use the proceeds for affordable housing and will forfeit over a million dollars in HUD funding



[1] https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article170828122.html
[3] See Inclusionary Regulations Updated 12/28/17. This policy clearly applies only to inclusionary units:  “(v) Over concentration.  The proposed construction of the Inclusionary Units on the parcel proposed shall not result in an over concentration of low income housing in any specific neighborhood.  As used herein, an “over concentration” exists when either 50 rental units legally restricted (by means of a recorded instrument) to occupancy by Very Low and/or Low Income Households are located within one-eighth mile from the parcel proposed for the off-site Inclusionary Units, or when 200 rental units legally restricted (by means of a recorded instrument) to occupancy by Very Low and/or Low Income Households are located within one-quarter mile from the parcel proposed for the off-site Inclusionary Units.” (p. 7).


[1] https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article170828122.html
[3] See Inclusionary Regulations Updated 12/28/17. This policy clearly applies only to inclusionary units:  “(v) Over concentration.  The proposed construction of the Inclusionary Units on the parcel proposed shall not result in an over concentration of low income housing in any specific neighborhood.  As used herein, an “over concentration” exists when either 50 rental units legally restricted (by means of a recorded instrument) to occupancy by Very Low and/or Low Income Households are located within one-eighth mile from the parcel proposed for the off-site Inclusionary Units, or when 200 rental units legally restricted (by means of a recorded instrument) to occupancy by Very Low and/or Low Income Households are located within one-quarter mile from the parcel proposed for the off-site Inclusionary Units.” (p. 7).

Monday, July 2, 2018

Reunite Refugee Families Separated at the Border: A Quaker Response to this Moral Crisis



 
Friends at a demo in Pasadena: Kim and Alex Hopkins, Chris and Elizabeth and their baby Max, and Anthony. See
https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2018/06/30/pasadena-demonstrators-parade-down-colorado-boulevard-to-urge-reuniting-immigrant-families/


Quakers have been concerned about refugees fleeing violence in Central America since the 1980s when Jim Corbett, an Arizona Quaker, helped to start the Sanctuary Movement. Many Quaker meetings throughout the nation, including Princeton Meeting (where I became a Quaker in 1984), took Salvadoran and other Latin American refugees under the care during this tumultuous period. 

Quakers have continued to feel deeply concerned about the fate of Central America refugees ever since. Most recently, in 2015, Pacific Yearly Meeting approved a minute of concern supporting efforts to support unaccompanied minors and refugee families:

“  This year six monthly meetings in Pacific Yearly Meeting have approved minutes of concern for refugee children crossing the border from Latin America. A special subcommittee of the Latin American Concerns Committee, Child Refugees and Migration, was formed to address this concern. Many Friends have taken action from visiting elected officials, accompanying a local child refugee through the legal processes, to traveling to Texas to be in solidarity with these children and their families. Pacific Yearly Meeting’s Annual Session supports the efforts of the LACC and numerous other Friends who are seeking justice and showing compassion toward those who are fleeing the violence in their home countries and need a place of refuge in our country. We encourage monthly meetings and individual Friends to read the attached minutes and take them to heart. We also encourage Friends to support the efforts of AFSC and FCNL to promote just and compassionate policies toward immigrants.” See Latin American Concerns Committtee Report

Friends are seeking ways to respond to the current refugee crisis. One example is a minute of concern recently approved by Santa Monica Meeting. Other Friends are taking action by visiting detainees in the Adelanto Detention Center. Some are accompanying refugees in the courts. Quaker organizations like FCNL and AFSC are calling for comprehensive immigration reform and an end to ICE. 

I am including this letter in hopes of stimulating more discussion among Friends (and others) about what we can do to respond to this latest moral crisis. 

Dear Friends,

On behalf of Worship and Ministry Committee, I'm happy to share the Minute approved by a Called Business Meeting on 6/24/18.

Minute 18-06-01 . As Quakers, we are called to treat our fellow human beings with the utmost respect, dignity and care, including those with whom we disagree strongly. This does not mean, however that we will remain silent when acts of great harm are committed by the most powerful against the most vulnerable. We will not remain silent when God, or any sacred justification, is invoked to support such actions.

As people of faith, we call for an immediate end to the practice of removing children from their parents because their parents have attempted to enter the United States,  regardless of whether that entry constitutes a misdemeanor under U.S. law. We call for immediately reuniting children and parents already separated. We call for an immediate end to the incarceration of children, with or without their parents. And we call for an end to any and all practices that treat any immigrating individuals as less  than” or “other,” or that treat them with hostility and cruelty.

We commit to actively working with all those striving to ensure that our immigration policies reflect the best of ourshared humanity and are grounded in the compassionate  application of the principle of “liberty and justice for all.”” 

One Friend raised concern that the phrase "we actively commit" implied that all friends and attenders are committed to take action. We clarify that no, this does not require all friends and attenders to act. The commitment of the Meeting is to provide support and blessing to all who choose to take action on these heartbreaking and inhumane immigration practices. Our actions are enhanced through the community, knowing that we speak and act not just as individual Quakers, but on behalf of and with the strength of the commitment of our Santa Monica Meeting.
Peace and Social Action Committee stepped forward to take leadership. Friends were encouraged to attend P&SA meetings and to share ideas for action on our listserv.
***

Here are some actions that I (Anthony) recommend for us to do (based on a blog by Kit Danley, founder of Neighborhood Ministries in Phoenix, AZ):

· Pray, knowing that your prayer will lead to action.
· Give your financial resources to help people who are doing some of these things.  Here are a couple ways to give:
· Contact your Congress representatives and senators OFTEN. The FCNL will connect you directly to your senators. FCNL.org..
·  Write op-eds for your local newspaper
· Sign on to some national campaigns putting political pressure on D.C.  Here are a couple:
· Take the next 100 days to get involved in a local campaign supporting people who have come out publicly against these horrific practices.
· Volunteer at a shelter for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UACs) in your area (over 100 nationally).  It is a rigorous process to become a volunteer, but it is possible. Research is needed to find a UAC in your area.  
·  Volunteer at legal aid clinics where asylum families will go, should they make it that far, for help with their asylum cases. 
· Join efforts with some local advocacy groups that are completely dedicated to immigrant asylum seekers