To
us, it seems pretty obvious that Jesus, aka “the Prince of Peace,” wouldn’t be
a big supporter of the Second Amendment nor would he favor the arms trade,
drones, and other forms of violence. Yet not all Christians see guns as a
problem, or as un-Christian. A recent Arkansas law (the so-called “Church
Protection Act”) allows people to pack concealed pistols in churches. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/04/arkansas-guns-in-church-bill-passes-in-house_n_2618689.html ) Some preachers are such ardent pro-gun
advocates they preach this message from the pulpit. A gun-loving pastor in even
asked his congregation to bring guns to church to celebrate July 4th.
(http://www.askmen.com/money/money-news/28_gun-loving-pastor-piece-be-with-you.html.)
Christians have borne arms, served in the military, and on the police force. So
what does the Gospel tell us about the right to bear arms?
Just
prior to his entry into Jerusalem, a city Jesus knew would be hostile to his
prophetic message, he surprises his disciples by telling them they must arm
themselves, in apparent contradiction to what he said in the sermon on the
mount: “Love your enemies.”
35
[Jesus] asked them [the eleven apostles], "When I sent you out without a
purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?"
They said, "No, not a thing."
36 He said to them, "But now the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37 For I tell you, this scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered among the lawless’; and indeed what is written about me is being fulfilled."
38 They [the disciples] said, "See, Lord, here are two swords."
"It is enough," he replied. (Luke 22:35-38, NRSV).
They said, "No, not a thing."
36 He said to them, "But now the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37 For I tell you, this scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered among the lawless’; and indeed what is written about me is being fulfilled."
38 They [the disciples] said, "See, Lord, here are two swords."
"It is enough," he replied. (Luke 22:35-38, NRSV).
In
this passage, Jesus tells his disciples to take up swords not to defend
themselves (two swords would hardly have sufficed against the Roman legions),
but to fulfill a scriptural prophesy. The Messiah would be counted among the
lawless, and what do the lawless do? They carry swords.
Later
the moment of testing comes in the garden of Gethsemane. In the dead of night
Jesus is confronted with armed opponents, and Peter does what comes naturally:
he uses his sword in self-defense, cutting off the ear of his assailant.
Instead of praising Peter, Jesus reaches down and heals the wounded man. Then
he utters his most famous condemnation of violence: “Those that live by the
sword perish by the sword” (Matt. 26:52).
This
message transformed the hearts and minds of Jesus’ followers. In the darkness
of night Peter “stood his ground” and did what seemed perfectly natural, legal and
even commendable: he defended his leader using a lethal weapon. But Jesus
demonstrated a better way: non-violent resistance and healing. Jesus was
willing to sacrifice his life rather than harm another.
Most
of Jesus’ disciples followed this example, and all of the apostles were
persecuted and killed. None resisted violently. They set an example of nonviolence
that has been followed by peace-loving Christians ever since, from St Martin
(the Roman soldier who converted to Christianity and refused to bear arms) to
Martin Luther King.
Perhaps
it is time to take seriously, and update, Jesus’ message. “Those who make a
living from firearms will perish from firearms.” This is literally true. 30,000
Americans die each year due to firearms, twenty times more than in other rich
countries. Our addiction to guns is literally killing us. It is time for us to
follow the example and words of Jesus, and heal those who are deaf and blind to
these realities.
I've had the same thought Friend on the revision of Jesus' teaching about swords. I've thought about making a t-shirt with this on the back, and on the front it would say "I'm unarmed and not at all dangerous."
ReplyDeleteYour interpretation of the passage on the sword makes sense to me. Thank you for sharing it, Friend.
ReplyDelete-Chris Wynn
I don't understand your leap in logic from Jesus' comment that 2/12 being armed was 'enough', to saying that 2 swords was not enough to take on the Roman legions. Surely the point is that A) not all are called to be armed and fight to protect others and B) 2/12, or 17%, is a reasonable proportion of armorage. Thus follows the more logical queries, to wit, what if 17% of the adults at Aurora were armed instead of being targets in a gun free zone? What if 17% of the adults at VA Tech were armed instead of being targets in a gun free zone? I am haunted by these interrogatives. Having preached non-violence all my life, when I saw the pictures and stories of the theatre victims I wondered if God would really call me to sit there and do nothing while others are being killed. Going back to the literal source of the discussion, it would be much more difficult for any dominating political force to be effective if 17% of the adult subjects were armed. What do you reckon?
ReplyDeleteI understand your concern that we not "do nothing" when faced with violence. Neither Jesus nor Gandhi nor any other advocate of nonviolence calls for passivity. They call instead for "nonviolent resistance" to evil. There is a rich literature, with many examples, of how one can counteract violence nonviolently and successfully. If you like, I can provide examples. Studies show that arming people seldom helps in situations where they are threatened by armed terrorists. Again, I can provide you with a video that shows this very convincingly. There are many cases of unarmed, nonviolent protesters resisting armed tyrants--take, for example, the women of Liberia who help oust the warloard Charles Taylor. But the message of Jesus goes beyond effectiveness. He says his disciples, "Those that live by the sword die by the sword." Jesus utterly renounces violence, even in self-defense. We may not agree with Jesus on this point, but he is very clear and I don't know how we can honestly say we are followers of Jesus and also of Mars (the God of War).
ReplyDelete