Saturday, February 20, 2016

Rembering where we came from, welcoming the immigrants and refugees



Like over 50% of Americans, I am a descendant of immigrants who came to this land within 
My father and me around 1950
the
last hundred or so years. Approximately 13% of those living in America today are foreign-born. 17% are Latino. Over 12% of Americans came from Africa hundreds of years ago, by force, not by choice, but nonetheless have become an integral part of American life and culture. Except for the First People, who comprise around 1-2% of those living on what they call Turtle Island, we are all descendants of immigrants, many of whom were political and economic refugees.

My Greek ancestors started coming to this land at the end of 19th century, most of them moving to Chicago and New York. Nearly 400,000 came to the US during the first two decades of the 20th century. Most were fleeing political chaos and war in Greece and seeking economic opportunities in America. This huge influx of Greeks combined with millions of Italians led to a backlash against Southern Europeans that was very similar to today’s reaction against Latin Americans. The Immigration Act of 1924 imposed harsh restrictions on Southern European immigrant groups. Under that law, only one hundred Greeks per year were allowed legal entry into the United States.
My father was a Greek immigrant who came to the US around that time. He was only fourteen years old. When I hear about refugee children crossing our Southern border, I think of my Dad. What was it like for him to flee his homeland and come to the urban jungle of New York? He talked very little about these days, other than saying how hard he worked. Seven days a week, washing dishes and doing other menial jobs, with miserable pay and maybe a couple of hours off on Sunday to go to church. And there were no job protection for immigrants like him, no benefits.
He came from a beautiful jewel of an island called Andros, one of the largest islands of the
Left to right: my father George
with his brother Louie
Cyclades. Jill and I spent Easter there last year with my Greek relatives, and we absolutely loved it. Andros is known as the “island of sailors” since many shipping magnates settled there, and many of the young men of this island took to the sea because of lack of other job opportunities. My father came from an impoverished family of 17 children. He was smart enough to earn a scholarship to study in Athens, but the family didn’t have money for his room and board, so he got a job as a cabin boy on a ship bound for New York. When he arrived, he “jumped ship” and went to live with his brother Louie. He spoke no English and learned what he could by reading newspapers. He became a voracious reader of newspapers and books, and although he had little formal education, he could hold his own in conversations with professors. In fact, that was his nickname in his family. If he had lived to see me earn a Ph D, I’m sure he would have been very proud.
My father moved to Princeton, NJ, in the 1930s where a few Greeks lived and most either owned or worked in restaurants. My father worked hard and kept a low profile until the War broke out. Like millions of Italians and Greeks, he was given a choice: be 

drafted or be deported. He joined the military and was sent to England where he met and
My father in uniform
fell in love with my mother, a Scottish woman who worked in a clothing factory in Manchester.  My father was an infantryman and fought in the Battle of Normandy and the Battle of the Bulge. He earned his citizenship the hard way. He received his citizenship papers in Berlin three weeks before the war ended. He then went back to the United States where he was joined by my mother, who was only 20 years old. They were married in 1946 and three years later I was born. A child of war who became an advocate for peace.
I was deeply moved by a recent film called “Brooklyn” which depicts the coming-of-age of young Irish woman who came to the United States and married an Italian at about the same time that my mother came to this country and married a Greek. It is a poignant story that shows hard it was to be an immigrant in those days, especially for women.
It is even harder to be refugee. In the past decade sixty million people have been displaced from their homes because of war, violence, and the current climate crisis.
Many people have opened up their hearts and homes to these refugees, but some have hardened their hearts. Sadly, some of these hard-hearted people profess to be Christians.
As Rabbi Arthur Waskow noted, the Torah states 37 times that we are supposed to treat foreigners as if they were native born because our ancestors were once foreigners. He also observed very perceptively that the Bible probably had to repeat this commandment 37 times in part because people tend to become hard-hearted once they settle down and “own” property. We forget that “the earth is the Lord’s” and we don’t really own it. We are accountable to the true owner for how we use it.
In Hebrews 13 the apostle Paul reminds us that that strangers may be angels in disguise and should be treated as such. In a talk she recently gave for a group called “Jesus for Revolutionaries,” Alexia Salvatierra reminded us that the word “angel” literally means messengers. How different immigrants and refugees would seem to us if we saw them as God’s messengers!
Hospitality is the core teaching of the Abrahamic faith. Muslims, Christians and Jews all claim to be spiritual descendants of Abraham and Sarah, a migrant couple who showed hospitality to three strangers. As a result, their descendants were blessed by God.

Greek islander giving a hand to a Syrian refugee
I began this reflection by describing how Greeks immigrants came to this land as economic and political refugees in the early part of the 20th century, and were mostly not welcomed. During the past few years hundreds of thousands of Middle Eastern refugees have come to the shores of Greek islands, and the people there have welcomed them warmly, even though Greece is undergoing an economic crisis comparable to the Great Depression. I am proud of these Greeks who are committed to practicing filoxenia, love of the stranger, instead of xenophobia, fear of the stranger. We Americans can learn a lot from these Greek islanders.
America has been blessed by strangers who have come to our shores with their dreams, their ambitions and their gifts. America has been enriched beyond measure by many cultures and diverse religions.  We should welcome them with open hearts and open arms, just like the Greek islanders. So I’d like to conclude this reflection with a song that we will be using at the Palm Sunday Peace Parade this year.

Abraham Journeyed to a New Country

BUNESSAN 5.5.5.4 D ("Morning Has Broken")

Abraham journeyed to a new country;
Sarah went with him, journeying too.
Slaves down in Egypt fled Pharaoh's army;
 Ruth left the home and people she knew.

Mary and Joseph feared Herod's order;
Soldiers were coming! They had to flee.
Taking young Jesus, they crossed the border;
So was our Lord a young refugee.


Some heard the promise — God's hand would bless them!
Some fled from hunger, famine and pain.
Some left a place where others oppressed them;
All trusted God and started again.

Did they know hardship? Did they know danger?
Who shared a home or gave them some bread?
Who reached a hand to welcome the stranger?
Who saw their fear and gave hope instead?

God, our own families came here from far lands;
We have been strangers, "aliens" too.
May we reach out and offer a welcome
As we have all been welcomed by you.


 

Biblical References: Genesis 12; Ruth 1; Matthew 2:13-16, 10:40, 25:31-46; Hebrews 11, 13:2; Leviticus 19:18, 33-34
Tune: Traditional Gaelic melody ("Morning Has Broken")  
(MIDI)
Text: Copyright © 2010 by Carolyn Winfrey Gillette. All rights reserved.
Email:
bcgillette@comcast.net     New Hymns: www.carolynshymns.com/

 SOURCES


 

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Waiting upon the Lord daily... preparing for weekly worship


My friend Wendy Geiger writes:
I very much appreciate the "QuakerSpeak" video in which Arthur Larrabee emphasizes the importance of PREPARING for meeting for worship.  I've written about Friends arising on First Day, drinking cup after cup of coffee while reading the NYT and watching tv.  Then, they listen to NPR on the way to meeting and expect to go into a deep stillness for the next hour of meeting for worship.  Disconnect? 
 
She also adds these important heart-felt questions: "Do we infuse Quakerism in all aspects of our life?  Or, do we include Quakerism where we can fit it in our (busy, busy) life?"
 
I totally resonate with what Friend Wendy is saying. If we expect our First Day worship to be profound and meaningful, we need to prepare spiritually every day of the week.  If the only worship we do is one hour a week, we can't expect miracles. We get out of worship (or anything) what we put in. Of course, sometimes God's amazing grace fills us with joy and wonder and peace that we haven't earned or deserved. That's why we call it "grace." But God wants a serious, committed relationship with us, and is willing to do whatever that takes (including miracles), but to have the kind of relationship with God that brings eternal joy and inner peace takes time and commitment on our part as well as God's.
 
I think that Meetings get the vocal ministry they deserve (as my Buddhist friends would say). Spiritually committed Friends will receive spiritually deep ministry. Superficial Friends will receive superficial ministry. That may be a hard lesson for Friends who think they're weighty and like to point fingers at others who aren't, but I believe it's a spiritual law: "We reap what we sow." If we listen with the ears of the heart, we will hear deep truths even in seemingly superficial ministry. If we are caught up in our false selves (including the idea that we are Weighty Friends), we may well  think that even profound messages are crap.

The most profound ministry I've experienced hasn't been at my local Meeting, but at FCNL and at the FWCC gathering in Peru. These gatherings draw deeply committed, deeply spiritual Friends, and their ministry is usually Spirit-led and transformative.
 
During the recent FWCC gathering in Peru,  a Latin American pastor was preaching in Spanish, and young woman behind me broke down in tears. I turned around and asked her if she had a problem. "No problem," she replied, sobbing. "I'm happy. I'm crying tears of joy." Tear pouring down her face, she explained that she had realized for the first time in her life that there truly was "that of God" inside her and she was loved by God.  She had been raised a liberal Quaker and had been taught that other people had "that of God" inside them, but for the first time in her life she experienced the Inward Light in her own heart. This was such a powerful, overwhelming experienced she wept tears of joy. When I realized what she was experiencing, I wept with her, and so did my book-keeper Friend Lucy. Lucy is a birth-right Friend who came to FWCC for just such transformative moments. All three of us wept, feeling broken and tender and open to the Holy Spirit.
 
 I wonder: How often has the Holy Spirit opened hearts in most unprogrammed liberal meetings? In my experience, rarely, because most of us aren't willing to make a serious commitment to transformation. This young woman showed her commitment by traveling five thousand miles and spending a week in a sacred valley in order to be transformed. We expect to drive a few miles to Meeting once a week, sit in silence for an hour, and have a mystical transformation.
 
It can and does happen that we are transformed in our weekly worship. But the more we prepare ourselves spiritually, the more likely it is we will be ready for Spirit to transform us. That's why I am encouraging Friends to take more time to prepare themselves spiritually though daily spiritual practice, small group work--worship sharing, retreats, etc.
 
There is no quick solution to shallow vocal ministry or silent worship that is spiritually unfulfilling. Some Friends think that by eldering Friends who give messages, they can impose a deep, worshipful silence on a Meeting. That's not eldering, that's just intimidation. When people are afraid to speak for fear of being eldered, the Holy Spirit cannot do its work. The Inward Light grows dim. The soul withers. The spiritual life of the Meeting becomes dry as dust.  The silence of true worship is vibrant and expectant. Waiting for the Lord is the best antidote to despair caused by feeling alienated from God and one's true self.
 
Psalm 27 captures the joy of such expectant waiting:
 
"I would have despaired unless I had believed that I would see the goodness of the LORD In the land of the living, Wait for the LORD; Be strong and let your heart take courage; Yes, wait for the LORD!"
 
That's what real worship is about. To have faith that by waiting we can finally hear God's quiet whisper, the voice that guides us to where we need to go.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Hannah and the militant atheist: a parable about vocal ministry

There have been some interesting responses to my blog post on vocal ministry. By divine coincidence, a thoughtful discussion of this topic also took place on-line, moderated by Mary Klein, editor of The Western Friend. You can read her notes at  Better silence, better vocal ministry

In response to my blog, one Friend wrote:
I remember when Ministry and Counsel at our Friends meeting worried that someone might speak ecstatically, so they put restrictions on meeting.
Imagine how George and some of the early Quakers would be treated in our modern meetings. Strictly censured, even kicked out.

Hmm. Ecstatic utterances not allowed at Quaker Meeting? What kind of restrictions, I wonder? Given that criterion, I suspect that not only George Fox, but Jesus Christ would probably not be welcome at some Friends' meetings!

Another Friend noted that early Quakers often gave long messages during meeting for worship and our modern preference for short messages is just that, a modern preference.

Most shocking, however, was the a comment that a "weighty Friend" made to a Friend I correspond with. He told her bluntly, "Most messages are crap."

Ok, that's speaking plainly. I get it. He's pissed off.  I was shocked, but not surprised by the crudity of this remark. Quaker hostility is seldom so overt: it usually comes out in indirect form, like sarcasm or passive aggression. 

I think a lot of hurt along with hostility lurks inside many Friends and needs to be faced honestly and tenderly. That's why it's important to have an eldering process that involves a number of Friends, as this Friend notes:
Our meeting does usually have two people meet with a person, but only after the whole committee considers the situation to determine what's behind the person's ministry. Often what’s behind it is a lot of pain; we need to be tender with the person while also protecting the sacredness of worship. We try to make it clear that we value the person, and that we want to help shape the ministry, not snuff it out.
I would add that eldering should not  be directed just at the person who is being complained about, it should also involve the person who is doing the complaining. Does this complaint come from a place of love and concern for the Meeting, or is it coming from a place of ego, judgmentalism,  and anger? If it's the latter, then the complainers need counseling and healing, and maybe even some truth-telling and tough love. (That's the Jesus approach, who was willing to say to those who criticized others: "Judge not lest ye be judged!")

Facing one's Shadow (the Jungian term for the parts of ourselves we don't like to acknowledge and often project on others) is hard work and requires a lot of commitment, as I have learned from my own experience with therapy, spiritual direction and a men's support group. 

I told the Friend who was distressed by this crude remark that anyone who says things like this is a spiritual light-weight, not a weighty Friend. I encouraged her to listen to her Inward Guide and speak her truth, even if some Friends are offended or vexed. 

A truly weighty Friend made it clear that if we speak truth, we may not be appreciated in our home meetings. 

He also made it clear that what "defiles" us is not something we put into our mouths, but what comes out of our mouths. 
“Listen,” he said, “and try to understand.  It’s not what goes into your mouth that defiles you; you are defiled by the words that come out of your mouth.”Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you realize you offended the Pharisees by what you just said?”Jesus replied, “Every plant not planted by my heavenly Father will be uprooted,  so ignore them. They are blind guides leading the blind, and if one blind person guides another, they will both fall into a ditch.”  (Mark 7.14–23)
Jesus was not afraid to speak truth even when it offended others. He wasn't rattled by the eldering of the Pharisees  because he experienced God within himself. 

I'd like to follow this Friend's example and tell a parable I heard when I first started attending Meeting in Princeton many years ago.

I was told about an elderly Friend named Hannah who was very pious. She prayed constantly, read the Bible every day, and was always thinking of God. Whenever she lost a needle and found it, she was thankful and praise God. 

One First Day a Friend rose up in Meeting and delivered a long tirade against religion, and announced that he didn't believe in God. Once his sermon on atheism was over, he sat down. A stunned silence followed.

After Meeting, members of ministry and counsel were concerned about Hannah. She didn't complain, but they felt she might be hurt or offended by this militantly atheistic message.

"How did you feel about today's message?" asked a member of M & C.

"I had no problem with it," replied Hannah. "God is strong. He can take it."

This is the kind of inner confidence and security that I believe Steve Smith was alluding to when he noted that truly weighty Friends are not perturbed when their ideas about good order or Quaker process or whatever else they revere as God are challenged.  If we have a strong sense of the Spirit within us, we aren't rattled by messages that don't suit us. When our sense of God within us is strong, we can be accepting and loving of others and their differences.  Through God's infinite grace, we can roll with the punches, and stay centered.

Finally, I'd to share a process for "eldering" that transcend the we vs. them/him duality: "This Friend is causing a problem and we have to fix it." Instead of singling out an individual for correction,the whole meeting became involved in a "meeting for learning." This not only seems very Quakerly, it works! We did something similar to this at a Meeting where I was clerk of Pastoral Care and had similarly positive results.

Some years ago, our meeting organized a longish religious education series about speaking in meeting. We had particular individuals in mind who we wanted to get this education, but didn't want to single them out. So we invited everyone who had ministered in last year; fifty people came. We asked them to share about a time when they really spoke from the Spirit, and then share about a time when their ministry didn’t go well, and then we asked them how they went about discerning when to minister. Worship did become richer and deeper in our meeting for a while after that.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

What do we do when someone's vocal ministry offends us?

7 The Pharisees and some of the teachers of the law who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Jesus 2 and saw some of his disciples eating food with hands that were defiled, that is, unwashed. 3 (The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. 4 When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash. And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles.[a])
5 So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?”
6 He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:
“‘These people honor me with their lips,
    but their hearts are far from me.
7 They worship me in vain;
    their teachings are merely human rules.’[b]
8 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”


Mark 7:1-8New International Version (NIV)


I read this passage for my mid-day devotions right after having a conversation with an elder of my Quaker Meeting about vocal ministry, and it somehow seemed very pertinent. In unprogrammed Quaker worship, anyone can rise and give a message, and sometimes these spontaneous messages annoy some people. In my meeting, there is a lot of contention among Friends about what constitutes appropriate vocal ministry. For this reason, my friend Jean wanted to discuss with me a pamphlet I wrote called "Eldering and Vocal Ministry: Guidelines for the Vexed and Perplexed." Some Friends in our Meeting have very clear-cut ideas  about vocal ministry--it shouldn't be too long, or too preachy, it should come out of personal experience, etc. etc.--and when these expectations aren't met, they get vexed. Indeed, inappropriate vocal ministry vexes them to the point that they feel impelled to complain to ministry and counsel. And ministry and counsel feels obligated to do something about eldering those who violated our Quaker norms/rules and "disturb the peace." Some Friends have been deeply hurt by this eldering process. The question arises: Should we let Friends give ministry that other Friends find inappropriate, or should we silence them through "eldering"? Faced with this dilemma, what can we do?


This is a scenario that I am all too familiar with, having experienced it in virtually every Meeting I've attended. Sometimes I've been on the receiving end of eldering, and sometimes I have served on ministry and counsel and have been asked to elder those whose vocal ministry breaks what some Friends consider the norms or rules.

This story from Mark's gospel struck me as relevant to this eternal problem: how do we respond when our religious expectations aren't met, and when we are annoyed or angered by violations of our norms?

The Pharisees in this story aren't making an unreasonable request of Jesus' disciples: cleaning one's hands and food makes good sense. In light of their reasonableness, Jesus' response seems an overreaction. Why is he calling them hypocrites and invoking the prophet Isaiah? Why is Jesus so down on "human rules"?

I suspect that Jesus responded to the Pharisees because underlying their question was a lot of judmentalism, and anger. "Why do they eat with defiled hands?" ask the Pharisees, which is a loaded question.  "Defiled" is a strong word, implying a serious breach not just of etiquette, but of the Law, the Torah.

The Torah has a lot to say about cleanliness, but the "tradition of the elders" refers to rules that were added to Torah for those who wanted to be super-pious. These traditions about washing can be  found in the tractate calledYadayim or “Hands” (see Mishnah Yadayim 2:1). 


Although rules about cleanliness were important,  most Jews would agree that the "prime directive" of the Torah is "to love your neighbor and to love God." In responding as he did, Jesus may have wanted to shock the Pharisees into realizing that human rules and traditions can stand in the way of a direct relationship with God, and with one's fellow human beings, which is the purpose of Torah as well as of Jesus' ministry. 

Jesus also saw that the cleanliness of the Pharisees was a cover for a sense of spiritual superiority. Because the Pharisees were ritually clean, they also felt spiritually and socially superior.

Jesus wasn't interested to catering to those who felt religiously superior ("the righteous"), he deliberately sought for his disciples people who were uneducated, marginalized, and (as the saying goes) "unwashed." Fishermen, tax collectors, women, even prostitutes. He accepted and loved them just as they were (though from time to time he lovingly rebuked them, as good teachers sometimes do). 

What does this have to do with vocal ministry among Quakers? Most Friends tend to be middle class, and privileged. We are much closer to the Pharisees than we are to those that Jesus hung out with. We come to Meeting with a set of expectations that reflect our social values and beliefs. Generally speaking, middle class folk tend to value order, cleanliness, and "peace and quiet."  Therefore, we feel comfortable when everyone "follows the rules" or (to use Quakerspeak) observes "good order."

Steve Smith has written an excellent piece called "Weighty Friends and Quaker Pharisees" in which he talks about Friends who have been around the Quaker world a long time and think they know what "good order" among Quakers is all about. This can lead to judgmentalism, judging others harshly. "Valuing our own opinions," says Steve, "we may be quick to criticize what we regard as other Friends' missteps and failures" (Western Friend, March/April 2013, p. 16).


Underlying this sense of superiority, notes Steve, may be a deep sense of insecurity. As he notes,  "The more fragile our sense of self and the less satisfaction we feel in the rest of our lives, the more prone we are to judge."


When we feel insecure, we often react to others in ways that are harsh. Steve goes on to say "our responses to good order among Friends can be more hurtful among Friends than the lapses themselves."


Steve reminds us that truly "weighty Friends" don't "throw their weight around." They are usually light-hearted and buoyant people, like William Bacon Evans. They take their concerns seriously, but not themselves.


As for the "rules" about vocal ministry, I think that they can be very useful, when used to help us connect with Spirit. When we speak out of the silence, it is helpful to avoid sermonizing, editorializing, and excessive verbiage. But when Friends "break the rules," we need to remember that these expectations are just guidelines, created for a purpose. The purpose of these guidelines, and of our coming together in worship, is to help us to grow closer to God and to each other, to learn how to be more loving and compassionate.


Jesus spoke harshly to the Pharisee because they had made up rules and then expected others to live up to them. By being judgmental and assuming an air of superiority, they had distanced themselves from God and from love.


I don't suggest that we speak harshly as Jesus did to those in our Meeting who want others to follow "good order," but we nonetheless need to speak the truth in love.  The important question is not: did this Friend follow good order, but how do I learn to respond in love when I am annoyed or triggered?


Rather than casting blame on those who criticize others, it might be helpful to ask questions such as: "Why do you feel so strongly that such-and-such a message was inappropriate?" If we are willing to go deep and find out where these strong feelings of judgmentalism are coming from, we can begin to know ourselves better and to heal ourselves.

The early Christian contemplatives valued silent worship, but they understood the dangers of justmentalism masquerading as silence. The monk Poeman said, “If a man appears silent in speech but is condemning other people in his heart, his is really talking incessantly. Another man may seem to talk all day, but he is keeping silence since he always speaks in a way that is right with his heart.” (101)


We can sense the difference between the guarded silence of someone who is judging others, and the joyous silence of one who is at peace with himself and with God. As we seek to build a community based on love and truth, we need to help each other to experience the silence that brings us closer to God, to our true selves and to others. If we want to know God/Reality intimately, if we want to have a loving relationship with those in our meeting, we need to let go of judgmentalism and listen compassionately to what is in our own hearts and the hearts of others. We need to seek "that of God" especially in those  who annoy or even hurt us. This I know from experience since I have been guilty of judging those who are judgmental!


I also know from experience that if we want to be true Friends and create a loving community of Friends, our prime directive must not be  a set of human rules, but a deep spiritual law: "treat others as you wish to be treated."  This simple but sometimes difficult-to-follow rule is what frees us to be wholehearted and loving Friends.














Sunday, February 7, 2016

"What will it take for the housing crisis to hit home?": Larry Wilson on "Granny Flats"

Larry Wilson, a columnist for the Pasadena Star News, has been promoting "granny flats" (second units) as a way to address the housing crisis. To make his case, he cites "Pasadena minister Jill Shook":
"My favorite fix for the housing crisis is one that is equally divisive among good folks: granny flats. These second units in single-family neighborhoods already exist in all of our cities, practically on every block. Some of them are separate buildings; some are within existing houses. Many or most of them are unpermitted, and there is the rub. While a state law, AB 1866, was passed in 2003 that ostensibly rezoned all single-family housing in California to allow for granny flats, the devil is in the details. Cities and counties still have final say on how zoning works. Citizens worried about parking and density in suburbia have prevented any real progress on second units. Most granny flats are still under the legal radar, inviting dangerous garage flats with no plumbing and dangerous space heaters and bad wiring.
"Pasadena minister Jill Shook tells in her wonderfully detailed book “Making Housing Happen: Faith-Based Affordable Housing Models” of having her activist heart broken when a citizen-based push to legalize granny flats in her city went south because of unreasonable restrictions written into the local ordinance at the last minute. Her group had drafted neighborhood-friendly guidelines that allowed for flexibility for the enormous socioeconomic differences within the city. The Planning Commission approved. At the City Council level, Shook and her allies packed the chambers with 21 local pastors, many of them African American. She acknowledged that this was just a piece of the housing puzzle, if an easy and important one. There seemed to be council support. At the last minute, after some council whispering, the ordinance was passed but radically changed: Only lots of over 15,000 square feet could get a granny flat. Few such lots exist. In the years since, two homeowners have applied. One has been built. What will it take for the realities of our housing crisis to really hit home?"
For the rest of the articles, see:

Monday, February 1, 2016

Table talk and addressing the climate crisis: reflections on the FWCC World Gathering of Quakers

If you'd like to learn more about the

Friends World Committee for Consultation Section of the Americas,  you can  add newsletter@fwccamericas.org to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox!


logo
 
Section of the AmericasJanuary 29, 2016
In This Issue
The time has come for serious action to address the climate crisisby Anthony Manousos
Jonathan Wooley_ Charlotte Gordon_ Rachel Madenyika at the WPM


For me, one of the most exciting and encouraging events at the 2016 FWCC World Plenary was the consultation on the environment, facilitated by Charlotte Gordon (Aoteora New Zealand YM), Jonathan Woolley (director at QUNO in Geneva) and Rachel  Madenyika (QUNO representative in New York). Of 350 attending the gathering, over 60 Friends from around the world showed up for this remarkable consultation. Only FWCC has the convening power to bring together Quaker leaders from North America, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East, all of whom are affected by the climate crisis and are committed to addressing it.

During the 2012 Friends World Conference in Kabarak, Kenya, FWCC produced a powerful statement calling for "peace and eco-justice." This statement emerged from a deeply felt sense that Spirit is calling us to recognize the urgency of the climate crisis. "We must change, we must become careful stewards of all life," insists this statement. It evokes biblical language as well as Quaker tradition to remind us "we are called to be patterns and examples of peace and eco-justice, as difficult and decisive as the 18th and 19th century drive to abolish slavery." Powerful as this call is, it lacks specific advice on how Friends can become the change we so urgently need.

Since the 2012 consultation, there has been a growing sense that FWCC needs to offer concrete recommendations on what Friends can do to make a difference. During our 2016 gathering in the Sacred Valley of Peru, the spiritual heart of the Inca civilization, we became aware that local rivers are polluted, insecticides and pesticides are poisoning the farmland, and indigenous people are protesting the mining that is desecrating their sacred mountains. I was told that some of the spiritual leaders of the local indigenous community have placed their hands to the ground and feel the sadness of mother Earth.

Feeling this deep pain in the midst of a breathtakingly beautiful Andean landscape, we wrote: "Our hearts are crying out for our beloved mother Earth, who is sick and in need of our care." As a starting point, we came up with 27 specific actions that individuals, monthly meetings and yearly meetings can take to foster sustainability. They range from "grow your own food and plant trees" to "support Quakers in politics and international work."

FWCC calls for every Yearly Meeting to:

1. initiate at least two concrete actions on sustainability within the next twelve months.
2. support individuals and groups in their meetings who feel called to take action on sustainability.
3. support the work done by Quaker organizations such as Quaker UN Office and Quaker Council for European Affairs to insure that international agreements and their implementation support sustainability.

In addition to advising others what to do, FWCC has committed to "invest ethically" (meaning it is divesting from fossil fuels and supporting green energy); share Quaker experiences with other faith groups; bring Quakers together from around the world in a sustainable way; and encourage Quaker pastors, teachers, and leaders to become more environmentally conscious.

In future issues of the FWCC newsletter and on the FWCC webpage, a full report will be published along with more details.

I would like to conclude by saying what written reports usually fail to convey: the deep sense of urgency felt by those present; the moving stories told by Friends from the global south, where crops are failing, farmers can no longer make a living and other disastrous effects of the climate crisis are already being felt; and also the stories of hope and resistance told by Friends who are making a difference in their home countries. Only at a world Quaker gathering like this could we feelingly sense the "big picture" of how the climate crisis is affecting all of us, and how we can work together as a Quaker family  to "redouble our efforts right now." As our minute states, "We must move beyond our individual and collective comfort zones and involve the worldwide Quaker community." 

I hope that Friends will take to heart this advice as well as the report's call to look more deeply: "The environmental crisis is only a symptom of a wider crisis in our political and economic system. Our loving and well-informed environmental actions as Friends must therefore work to transform these systems."
 

Table Fellowship at FWCC: Ireland, Bolivia, Peru and Central America find common ground in Pisac, Peru
by Jill Shook 

  Grant_ Jill_ Catherine and Neva eat lunch at the WPM
  
"De donde eres?" I ask as we sit down for lunch at the Royal Inka Hotel, the site of our world conference.

"De Bolivia," replies the man in Spanish, who tells me he's the director of a private Christian school.

Then I ask the man across the table, "Where are you from?"

 "I am Irish, from a long line of Quakers. My father visited the first political prisoners to die in a hunger strike, among those in prison standing for fair treatment of prisoners."

 "Why were there political prisoners in Ireland?" asks the Bolivian in Spanish after I translate for him.

The Irishman summarizes the long history of a violent division between Catholics in the south and Protestants in the north in his country, rooted in unequal rights, such as Catholics not being given the right to vote or own a home.

I ask the Bolivian if similar divisions exist in his country.

"Yes, there has been a long history of tension and division between the Aymara and Quechua Indians, like a seam down the center of our Cordillera Mountains, with one group trying to take the land of the other. And at times it becomes violent."

The Irishman tells us about the beginnings of the Quaker House in Ireland, strategically placed in the geographic center of the conflict between the north and south. And how over the years, peace teams from around the world have gone to Quaker House to participate in trainings on non-violence and conflict resolution. They also made a public witness - standing in the gap like Jesus, reconciling us to God and to each other.

As we eat our Peruvian potatoes, a Latina American Friends Service Committee worker in Guatemala, who was sitting next to us, turns from her conversation to join ours.  She tells us that Guatemala is the thirteenth most violent country in the world, Honduras is number one, and El Salvador is number two. She explains how she works with youth, helping them form a network of support and a collective voice to deal with the violence in a peaceful way. She says they are beginning similar work in Honduras and El Salvador.

She asks me how I learned Spanish, and where I am from. I explain that I live in Pasadena, CA, in the United States, and attend the Orange Grove Meeting with my husband Anthony Manousos.  I learned Spanish while living in Mexico, coordinating work teams from across the USA to serve alongside villagers to do community and economic development projects.

As a silent listener next to us tops off our glasses of purified water, the Irishman concludes by telling us about his Catholic and Protestant neighbors who are now friends, and that the residue of this historical conflict today mostly exists in their memories.

As we drink down our last drops of water, our tummies and hearts and minds are full, feeling hope, and a growing appetite to learn from each other, to keep our hearts open to new friendships and understanding between programmed and un-programmed Friends.         
  
After finishing our lunch I stand and look through the glass walls of the Royal Inka dining hall, to the ancient Inca Ventanayoc Mountain lifting its praise to God. Then I peer across the room at conversations similar to ours taking place among the 350 attendees packed around the 45 tables. My heart sings as I see worshippers seeing "that of God" in each other and feel the buzz of hearts and minds uniting around table fellowship. 


Like us on Facebook

 donate_now_blue3_btn.gif
 
Friends World Committee for Consultation Section of the Americas,1506 Race St., Philadelphia, PA 19102
Sent by newsletter@fwccamericas.org in collaboration with